Resonant Laser Ablation: Threshold Behavior and Semiquantitative Aspects

J. Anderson, G. Eiden, N. S. Nogar
{"title":"Resonant Laser Ablation: Threshold Behavior and Semiquantitative Aspects","authors":"J. Anderson, G. Eiden, N. S. Nogar","doi":"10.1364/laca.1994.thb.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ever since the first report of laser action, it has been recognized that laser ablation (evaporation/volatilization) may provide a useful sampling mechanism for chemical analysis. In particular, laser ablation is rapidly gaining popularity as a method of sample introduction for mass spectrometry. Since its original description, numerous research papers and review articles have appeared on various aspects of laser mass spectrometry.1,2 While most laser ablation/mass spectrometry has been performed with fixed frequency lasers operating at relatively high intensities/fluences (≥108 W/cm2, ≥1 J/cm2), there has been some recent interest in the use of tunable lasers to enhance the ionization yield of selected components in an analytical sample. This process has been termed resonant laser ablation (RLA).3–5 Potential advantages of RLA include: 1) simplification of the mass spectrum, by enhancement of signal from the analyte of interest; 2) improvement of the absolute detection limits by improving the ionization efficiency, and 3) improvement in relative sensitivity by reduction of spurious signal in the detection channel of interest (due to bleed through from adjascent mass channels or from isobaric interferences).","PeriodicalId":252738,"journal":{"name":"Laser Applications to Chemical Analysis","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laser Applications to Chemical Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1364/laca.1994.thb.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ever since the first report of laser action, it has been recognized that laser ablation (evaporation/volatilization) may provide a useful sampling mechanism for chemical analysis. In particular, laser ablation is rapidly gaining popularity as a method of sample introduction for mass spectrometry. Since its original description, numerous research papers and review articles have appeared on various aspects of laser mass spectrometry.1,2 While most laser ablation/mass spectrometry has been performed with fixed frequency lasers operating at relatively high intensities/fluences (≥108 W/cm2, ≥1 J/cm2), there has been some recent interest in the use of tunable lasers to enhance the ionization yield of selected components in an analytical sample. This process has been termed resonant laser ablation (RLA).3–5 Potential advantages of RLA include: 1) simplification of the mass spectrum, by enhancement of signal from the analyte of interest; 2) improvement of the absolute detection limits by improving the ionization efficiency, and 3) improvement in relative sensitivity by reduction of spurious signal in the detection channel of interest (due to bleed through from adjascent mass channels or from isobaric interferences).
共振激光烧蚀:阈值行为和半定量方面
自从激光作用的第一篇报道以来,人们已经认识到激光烧蚀(蒸发/挥发)可能为化学分析提供一种有用的取样机制。特别是,激光烧蚀作为一种质谱样品导入方法正迅速获得普及。自从它最初的描述,大量的研究论文和评论文章出现在激光质谱的各个方面。1,2虽然大多数激光烧蚀/质谱都是用固定频率的激光器在相对较高的强度/影响下进行的(≥108 W/cm2,≥1 J/cm2),但最近人们对使用可调谐激光器来提高分析样品中选定组分的电离率产生了一些兴趣。这一过程被称为共振激光烧蚀(RLA)。RLA的潜在优势包括:1)通过增强目标分析物的信号,简化了质谱;2)通过提高电离效率来提高绝对检测极限,以及3)通过减少感兴趣的检测通道中的杂散信号(由于邻近质量通道或等压干扰的溢出)来提高相对灵敏度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信