Abdominal aortic aneurysms. Is there an association between surgical volume, surgical experience, hospital type and operative mortality? Members of the Norwegian Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Trial.

Acta chirurgica Scandinavica Pub Date : 1990-04-01
S Amundsen, R Skjaerven, A Trippestad, O Søreide
{"title":"Abdominal aortic aneurysms. Is there an association between surgical volume, surgical experience, hospital type and operative mortality? Members of the Norwegian Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Trial.","authors":"S Amundsen,&nbsp;R Skjaerven,&nbsp;A Trippestad,&nbsp;O Søreide","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The effects of number of operations, experience of the surgeon, and type of hospital on operative mortality have been studied in 444 patients treated for abdominal aortic aneurysms. In the elective group (n = 279) there was a significant difference in mortality between hospitals in which more than 10 such operations were done compared with those in which less than 10 were done during the study period (p = 0.05; odds ratio (OR) 2.7). In the ruptured group there was no statistically significant difference (p = 0.14; OR 1.9). In the elective group, units with vascular surgical experience had an operative mortality of 4.8% compared with 11.3% for other units (p = 0.05; OR 2.6). In the ruptured group the figures were 52.5% and 73.3% respectively (p = 0.03; OR 2.5). There was no difference in operative mortality between university, county and local hospitals. Outcome of treatment after operations for abdominal aortic aneurysm was related to number of operations carried out and experience, whereas the type of hospital seemed less important.</p>","PeriodicalId":7005,"journal":{"name":"Acta chirurgica Scandinavica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta chirurgica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The effects of number of operations, experience of the surgeon, and type of hospital on operative mortality have been studied in 444 patients treated for abdominal aortic aneurysms. In the elective group (n = 279) there was a significant difference in mortality between hospitals in which more than 10 such operations were done compared with those in which less than 10 were done during the study period (p = 0.05; odds ratio (OR) 2.7). In the ruptured group there was no statistically significant difference (p = 0.14; OR 1.9). In the elective group, units with vascular surgical experience had an operative mortality of 4.8% compared with 11.3% for other units (p = 0.05; OR 2.6). In the ruptured group the figures were 52.5% and 73.3% respectively (p = 0.03; OR 2.5). There was no difference in operative mortality between university, county and local hospitals. Outcome of treatment after operations for abdominal aortic aneurysm was related to number of operations carried out and experience, whereas the type of hospital seemed less important.

腹主动脉瘤。手术量、手术经验、医院类型和手术死亡率之间是否存在关联?挪威腹主动脉瘤试验的成员。
本文对444例腹主动脉瘤患者的手术次数、外科医生经验和医院类型对手术死亡率的影响进行了研究。在择期组(n = 279)中,在研究期间进行10次以上手术的医院与少于10次手术的医院之间的死亡率有显著差异(p = 0.05;优势比(OR) 2.7)。破裂组差异无统计学意义(p = 0.14;或1.9)。在择期组,有血管手术经验的单位手术死亡率为4.8%,而其他单位为11.3% (p = 0.05;或2.6)。破裂组分别为52.5%和73.3% (p = 0.03;或2.5)。大学医院、县医院和地方医院的手术死亡率无差异。腹主动脉瘤术后的治疗效果与手术次数和经验有关,而医院类型似乎不太重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信