Beyond the Prohibition of Images: The Representation of the Unrepresentable in the Film Son of Saul

Kyoung-jin Lee
{"title":"Beyond the Prohibition of Images: The Representation of the Unrepresentable in the Film Son of Saul","authors":"Kyoung-jin Lee","doi":"10.37123/th.2022.12.209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Direct representation of genocide has long been considered taboo in Holocaust cinema. In particular, the ‘image prohibition’ claimed by Claude Lanzmann, the director of Shoah, a milestone film in Holocaust film history, had a tremendous effect on artistic work concerning the Holocaust. However, Nemes László's film Son of Saul (2015) convincingly refutes the prevalent concerns about visual representation of Shoah. It manages to reconstruct the experience of a Sonderkommando member, a key witness of the Holocaust, by the careful arrangement of the camera's views, depth of field, and sound. To do this, the director takes seriously the issues regarding the Holocaust's unrepresentability, rather than ignoring or disputing them. If Shoah cannot be portrayed, it is because Shoah is a double annihilation in that it annihilated the Jews as well as the evidences of their annihilation. The film shows how the Nazi's destruction of representability can be placed in the order of representation at the level of not only film aesthetics but also narrative.","PeriodicalId":443880,"journal":{"name":"Sookmyung Research Institute of Humanities","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sookmyung Research Institute of Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37123/th.2022.12.209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Direct representation of genocide has long been considered taboo in Holocaust cinema. In particular, the ‘image prohibition’ claimed by Claude Lanzmann, the director of Shoah, a milestone film in Holocaust film history, had a tremendous effect on artistic work concerning the Holocaust. However, Nemes László's film Son of Saul (2015) convincingly refutes the prevalent concerns about visual representation of Shoah. It manages to reconstruct the experience of a Sonderkommando member, a key witness of the Holocaust, by the careful arrangement of the camera's views, depth of field, and sound. To do this, the director takes seriously the issues regarding the Holocaust's unrepresentability, rather than ignoring or disputing them. If Shoah cannot be portrayed, it is because Shoah is a double annihilation in that it annihilated the Jews as well as the evidences of their annihilation. The film shows how the Nazi's destruction of representability can be placed in the order of representation at the level of not only film aesthetics but also narrative.
超越形象的禁止:电影《扫罗之子》中不可表征的再现
在大屠杀电影中,直接表现种族灭绝一直被认为是禁忌。特别是大屠杀电影史上具有里程碑意义的电影《Shoah》的导演克劳德·兰兹曼(Claude Lanzmann)所主张的“图像禁止”,对有关大屠杀的艺术作品产生了巨大影响。然而,Nemes László的电影《扫罗之子》(2015)令人信服地驳斥了对大屠杀视觉表现的普遍担忧。它通过精心安排镜头的视角、景深和声音,成功地重建了一名特遣突击队成员的经历,他是大屠杀的关键证人。为了做到这一点,导演认真对待有关大屠杀不可代表性的问题,而不是忽视或争论它们。如果Shoah不能被描绘出来,那是因为Shoah是一种双重毁灭,因为它毁灭了犹太人,也毁灭了他们被毁灭的证据。这部电影展示了纳粹对再现性的破坏是如何在电影美学和叙事的层面上被置于再现的顺序中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信