The Constitutional Type Questionnaire: validation in the patient population of the Royal London Homoeopathic Hospital

RA van Haselen , S Cinar , P Fisher , J Davidson
{"title":"The Constitutional Type Questionnaire: validation in the patient population of the Royal London Homoeopathic Hospital","authors":"RA van Haselen ,&nbsp;S Cinar ,&nbsp;P Fisher ,&nbsp;J Davidson","doi":"10.1054/homp.1999.0493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In homeopathy the choice of a medicine is based on the total ‘picture’ presented by the patient. This picture includes ‘constitutional type’ which comprises personality, and general physical features. The Constitutional Type Questionnaire (CTQ) is designed to systematically assess constitutional types. This study examines the reliability and validity of the CTQ. Four hundred and seventy-two outpatients attending clinics at the Royal London Homoeopathic Hospital completed the CTQ, a 152-item scale rating features traditionally considered typical of 19 constitutional homeopathic medicine ‘pictures’ on 5-point frequency or severity scales. A subsample was retested after 1 week to measure the test–retest reliability. Another subsample was prescribed a medicine by a homeopathic doctor. Prescriptions were compared with the CTQ, to assess the content validity of the scale. The construct validity was measured by Grade of Membership (GOM) analysis. The scale demonstrated good test–retest reliability (<em>r</em>=0.73), internal consistency (<em>r</em>=0.95). The correlation between CTQ results and the medicine prescribed by the homeopathic doctor was 75.8%. The GOM analyses are reported by Davidson <em>et al</em> elsewhere in this issue of the journal. Although the CTQ could be improved, the scale displays good reliability and validity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100201,"journal":{"name":"British Homoeopathic Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1054/homp.1999.0493","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Homoeopathic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1475491699904939","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

In homeopathy the choice of a medicine is based on the total ‘picture’ presented by the patient. This picture includes ‘constitutional type’ which comprises personality, and general physical features. The Constitutional Type Questionnaire (CTQ) is designed to systematically assess constitutional types. This study examines the reliability and validity of the CTQ. Four hundred and seventy-two outpatients attending clinics at the Royal London Homoeopathic Hospital completed the CTQ, a 152-item scale rating features traditionally considered typical of 19 constitutional homeopathic medicine ‘pictures’ on 5-point frequency or severity scales. A subsample was retested after 1 week to measure the test–retest reliability. Another subsample was prescribed a medicine by a homeopathic doctor. Prescriptions were compared with the CTQ, to assess the content validity of the scale. The construct validity was measured by Grade of Membership (GOM) analysis. The scale demonstrated good test–retest reliability (r=0.73), internal consistency (r=0.95). The correlation between CTQ results and the medicine prescribed by the homeopathic doctor was 75.8%. The GOM analyses are reported by Davidson et al elsewhere in this issue of the journal. Although the CTQ could be improved, the scale displays good reliability and validity.

体质类型问卷:在伦敦皇家顺势疗法医院的患者人群验证
在顺势疗法中,药物的选择是基于病人呈现的整体“画面”。这张图包括“体质类型”,包括性格和一般的身体特征。体质类型问卷(CTQ)旨在系统地评估体质类型。本研究检验了问卷的信度和效度。在皇家伦敦顺势疗法医院(Royal London顺势疗法Hospital)就诊的472名门诊患者完成了CTQ,这是一份包含152个项目的量表,传统上被认为是19种顺势疗法“图片”的典型特征,分为5分频率或严重程度量表。1周后对子样本进行重测,测量重测信度。另一个子样本是由顺势疗法医生开的药。将处方与CTQ量表进行比较,评价量表的内容效度。构念效度采用隶属度分析(GOM)来衡量。量表具有良好的重测信度(r=0.73)和内部一致性(r=0.95)。CTQ结果与顺势疗法医师所开药物的相关性为75.8%。Davidson等人在本期杂志的其他地方报道了GOM分析。该量表虽有改进空间,但信效度较好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信