Examining Metacognitive Strategy Preferences of Students at Different Reading Proficiency Levels

Tahsin Fırat, İ. Koyuncu
{"title":"Examining Metacognitive Strategy Preferences of Students at Different Reading Proficiency Levels","authors":"Tahsin Fırat, İ. Koyuncu","doi":"10.52380/ijpes.2023.10.1.997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to evaluate the distribution of students with varying levels of reading competence according to their selection of metacognitive methods from the 2018 Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) survey. The research group consisted of 6,890 pupils from the Republic of Turkey who participated in the PISA 2018 study. The data were analyzed using the multivariate exploratory technique of correspondence analysis. In comparison to developing readers, skilled readers favored the metacognitive processes of summarizing, understanding and remembering, and evaluating believability. Awareness of appropriate metacognitive reading strategies should be emphasized in order to increase the reading comprehension of developing readers.","PeriodicalId":411995,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies","volume":"211 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52380/ijpes.2023.10.1.997","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the distribution of students with varying levels of reading competence according to their selection of metacognitive methods from the 2018 Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) survey. The research group consisted of 6,890 pupils from the Republic of Turkey who participated in the PISA 2018 study. The data were analyzed using the multivariate exploratory technique of correspondence analysis. In comparison to developing readers, skilled readers favored the metacognitive processes of summarizing, understanding and remembering, and evaluating believability. Awareness of appropriate metacognitive reading strategies should be emphasized in order to increase the reading comprehension of developing readers.
不同阅读水平学生元认知策略偏好的研究
本研究的目的是根据2018年国际学生评估项目(PISA)调查中不同阅读能力水平的学生对元认知方法的选择来评估他们的分布。该研究小组由6890名来自土耳其共和国的学生组成,他们参加了2018年的PISA研究。采用对应分析的多元探索技术对数据进行分析。与发展型阅读者相比,熟练阅读者更倾向于总结、理解和记忆以及评估可信度的元认知过程。为了提高发展中读者的阅读理解能力,应重视对适当的元认知阅读策略的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信