The New Grass Roots: Faculty Responses to the Writing-Enriched Curriculum

Chris M. Anson
{"title":"The New Grass Roots: Faculty Responses to the Writing-Enriched Curriculum","authors":"Chris M. Anson","doi":"10.37514/per-b.2021.1299.2.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although assessment is a crucial component of the WEC model, studies of how faculty respond to its implementation are needed, especially by outsiders who can impartially analyze its successful uptake. This chapter describes an interview-based study of eight faculty—four at a small liberal arts college and four at a large state-supported university—representing five departments all in the formative stages of WEC implementation. Analysis based on grounded theory surfaced five themes that interviewees consistently described, and that appear to be important considerations in the development of the WEC model and in the inductive learning of threshold concepts for WAC: the role of cross-curricular activities such as faculty workshops; the importance of departmental autonomy and self-directed innovation; the usefulness of lower-stakes, learning-based writing; the perception of improvement in student writing ability; and the transformative effects of WEC as a pedagogical and curricular initiative.","PeriodicalId":200684,"journal":{"name":"Writing-Enriched Curricula: Models of Faculty-Driven and Departmental Transformation","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Writing-Enriched Curricula: Models of Faculty-Driven and Departmental Transformation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37514/per-b.2021.1299.2.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Although assessment is a crucial component of the WEC model, studies of how faculty respond to its implementation are needed, especially by outsiders who can impartially analyze its successful uptake. This chapter describes an interview-based study of eight faculty—four at a small liberal arts college and four at a large state-supported university—representing five departments all in the formative stages of WEC implementation. Analysis based on grounded theory surfaced five themes that interviewees consistently described, and that appear to be important considerations in the development of the WEC model and in the inductive learning of threshold concepts for WAC: the role of cross-curricular activities such as faculty workshops; the importance of departmental autonomy and self-directed innovation; the usefulness of lower-stakes, learning-based writing; the perception of improvement in student writing ability; and the transformative effects of WEC as a pedagogical and curricular initiative.
新草根:教师对写作强化课程的反应
尽管评估是WEC模式的关键组成部分,但仍需要研究教师对其实施的反应,特别是由能够公正分析其成功实施情况的外部人士进行研究。本章描述了对八名教师的访谈研究,其中四名来自一所小型文理学院,四名来自一所大型州立大学,代表五个部门,都处于WEC实施的形成阶段。基于扎根理论的分析揭示了受访者一致描述的五个主题,这似乎是WEC模型发展和WAC阈值概念归纳学习的重要考虑因素:教师研讨会等跨学科活动的作用;部门自主与自主创新的重要性低风险、学习型写作的有用性;学生写作能力提高的观感以及WEC作为一项教学和课程倡议的变革性影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信