BEST PAPER: A Knowledge Task-Based Framework for Design and Evaluation of Information Visualizations

R. Amar, J. Stasko
{"title":"BEST PAPER: A Knowledge Task-Based Framework for Design and Evaluation of Information Visualizations","authors":"R. Amar, J. Stasko","doi":"10.1109/INFVIS.2004.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The design and evaluation of most current information visualization systems descend from an emphasis on a user's ability to \"unpack\" the representations of data of interest and operate on them independently. Too often, successful decision-making and analysis are more a matter of serendipity and user experience than of intentional design and specific support for such tasks; although humans have considerable abilities in analyzing relationships from data, the utility of visualizations remains relatively variable across users, data sets, and domains. In this paper, we discuss the notion of analytic gaps, which represent obstacles faced by visualizations in facilitating higher-level analytic tasks, such as decision-making and learning. We discuss support for bridging the analytic gap, propose a framework for design and evaluation of information visualization systems, and demonstrate its use","PeriodicalId":109217,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"198","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/INFVIS.2004.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 198

Abstract

The design and evaluation of most current information visualization systems descend from an emphasis on a user's ability to "unpack" the representations of data of interest and operate on them independently. Too often, successful decision-making and analysis are more a matter of serendipity and user experience than of intentional design and specific support for such tasks; although humans have considerable abilities in analyzing relationships from data, the utility of visualizations remains relatively variable across users, data sets, and domains. In this paper, we discuss the notion of analytic gaps, which represent obstacles faced by visualizations in facilitating higher-level analytic tasks, such as decision-making and learning. We discuss support for bridging the analytic gap, propose a framework for design and evaluation of information visualization systems, and demonstrate its use
最佳论文:基于知识任务的信息可视化设计与评估框架
当前大多数信息可视化系统的设计和评估都着重于用户“解包”感兴趣的数据表示并独立操作它们的能力。通常情况下,成功的决策和分析更多是偶然发现和用户体验的问题,而不是对这些任务的有意设计和具体支持;尽管人类在分析数据关系方面有相当大的能力,但可视化的效用在不同的用户、数据集和领域之间仍然相对可变。在本文中,我们讨论了分析差距的概念,它代表了可视化在促进更高层次的分析任务(如决策和学习)时所面临的障碍。我们讨论了对弥合分析差距的支持,提出了一个设计和评估信息可视化系统的框架,并演示了它的使用
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信