Risks in Student Projects

Diana Kirk, Andrew Luxton-Reilly, E. Tempero
{"title":"Risks in Student Projects","authors":"Diana Kirk, Andrew Luxton-Reilly, E. Tempero","doi":"10.1145/3511861.3511877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Anecdotally, tertiary educators in software related topics experience challenges during project-based group assessments. To address the range of issues experienced, some educators have introduced aspects of project management (PM) into their course. However, the key focus for software courses is not project management and time spent teaching PM techniques means less time is available for addressing course objectives. In this paper, we describe a study to investigate the use of PM reference models to identify the main areas of risk for student projects. We evaluated some common reference models and selected the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK®) as being the most suitable. We mapped the issues as reported in the computer science education (CSE) literature on group projects to the PMBOK® Knowledge Areas (KAs) and found that only a subset of the KAs was relevant. We used these KAs to categorise the key risks for student projects. Our contributions are the exposure of a gap in the literature on student project risk and the identification of the main sources of risk. There is a need for researchers to further investigate project risk in tertiary group projects in order to help instructors introduce appropriate PM concepts to support their projects.","PeriodicalId":175694,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 24th Australasian Computing Education Conference","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 24th Australasian Computing Education Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3511861.3511877","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Anecdotally, tertiary educators in software related topics experience challenges during project-based group assessments. To address the range of issues experienced, some educators have introduced aspects of project management (PM) into their course. However, the key focus for software courses is not project management and time spent teaching PM techniques means less time is available for addressing course objectives. In this paper, we describe a study to investigate the use of PM reference models to identify the main areas of risk for student projects. We evaluated some common reference models and selected the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK®) as being the most suitable. We mapped the issues as reported in the computer science education (CSE) literature on group projects to the PMBOK® Knowledge Areas (KAs) and found that only a subset of the KAs was relevant. We used these KAs to categorise the key risks for student projects. Our contributions are the exposure of a gap in the literature on student project risk and the identification of the main sources of risk. There is a need for researchers to further investigate project risk in tertiary group projects in order to help instructors introduce appropriate PM concepts to support their projects.
学生项目的风险
有趣的是,软件相关主题的高等教育工作者在基于项目的小组评估中遇到了挑战。为了解决所经历的一系列问题,一些教育者在他们的课程中引入了项目管理(PM)的各个方面。然而,软件课程的重点不是项目管理,花时间教授项目管理技术意味着更少的时间可用于解决课程目标。在本文中,我们描述了一项研究,以调查项目管理参考模型的使用,以确定学生项目的主要风险领域。我们评估了一些常见的参考模型,并选择了最合适的项目管理知识体系(PMBOK®)。我们将小组项目的计算机科学教育(CSE)文献中报告的问题映射到PMBOK®知识领域(ka),并发现只有ka的子集是相关的。我们使用这些ka对学生项目的主要风险进行分类。我们的贡献是暴露了关于学生项目风险的文献中的差距,并确定了风险的主要来源。研究人员需要进一步调查第三组项目中的项目风险,以帮助教师引入适当的项目管理概念来支持他们的项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信