Comparing Classifiers for the Prediction of the Stenosis of Coronary Artery

Hataichanok Aakkara, Atumporn Aaisueb, Aeerapong Aeelanupab
{"title":"Comparing Classifiers for the Prediction of the Stenosis of Coronary Artery","authors":"Hataichanok Aakkara, Atumporn Aaisueb, Aeerapong Aeelanupab","doi":"10.1109/ecti-con49241.2020.9158312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Myocardial Ischemia is the main cause of mortality in patients with Coronary Artery Disease (CAD). One of the methods used in screening patients with this disease is the diag-nosis of radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging (rMPI). In this paper, we conducted a comparative study by experimenting on several machine learning models, such as Logistic Regression, Random Forest, XGBoost, etc., to classify the stenosis of coronary artery. High-level features from rMPI computed by 4D-MSPECT polar map were used to train/test the models. rMPI features of the risk group of CAD patients were obtained from a public hospital. With the hypothesis that patient characteristics (e.g., Diabetes Mellitus, Hypertension, Dyslipidemia) could improve the prediction performance of the models, this study also included patient characteristics in our experimentation as important parts of feature selection. All other processes (i.e., data cleaning, feature selection, feature engineering and feature transformation) in machine learning pipeline were also deliberately experimented in this study. For model selection, two-level validation regarding generalization and hyperparameter tuning were also performed.","PeriodicalId":371552,"journal":{"name":"2020 17th International Conference on Electrical Engineering/Electronics, Computer, Telecommunications and Information Technology (ECTI-CON)","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 17th International Conference on Electrical Engineering/Electronics, Computer, Telecommunications and Information Technology (ECTI-CON)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ecti-con49241.2020.9158312","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Myocardial Ischemia is the main cause of mortality in patients with Coronary Artery Disease (CAD). One of the methods used in screening patients with this disease is the diag-nosis of radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging (rMPI). In this paper, we conducted a comparative study by experimenting on several machine learning models, such as Logistic Regression, Random Forest, XGBoost, etc., to classify the stenosis of coronary artery. High-level features from rMPI computed by 4D-MSPECT polar map were used to train/test the models. rMPI features of the risk group of CAD patients were obtained from a public hospital. With the hypothesis that patient characteristics (e.g., Diabetes Mellitus, Hypertension, Dyslipidemia) could improve the prediction performance of the models, this study also included patient characteristics in our experimentation as important parts of feature selection. All other processes (i.e., data cleaning, feature selection, feature engineering and feature transformation) in machine learning pipeline were also deliberately experimented in this study. For model selection, two-level validation regarding generalization and hyperparameter tuning were also performed.
冠状动脉狭窄预测分类器的比较
心肌缺血是冠心病(CAD)患者死亡的主要原因。放射性核素心肌灌注显像(rMPI)是筛查本病患者的方法之一。在本文中,我们通过实验几种机器学习模型,如Logistic Regression、Random Forest、XGBoost等,对冠状动脉狭窄进行分类,进行了对比研究。利用4D-MSPECT极坐标图计算的rMPI高级特征对模型进行训练/测试。CAD危险组rMPI特征从某公立医院获得。假设患者特征(如糖尿病、高血压、血脂异常)可以提高模型的预测性能,本研究也将患者特征作为特征选择的重要部分纳入实验。机器学习管道中的所有其他过程(即数据清洗、特征选择、特征工程和特征转换)也在本研究中进行了刻意的实验。对于模型选择,还进行了关于泛化和超参数调整的两级验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信