A Comparative Study of Supervised and Unsupervised Machine Learning Algorithms on Consumer Reviews

Kartika Makkar, Pardeep Kumar, Monika Poriye, Shalini Aggarwal
{"title":"A Comparative Study of Supervised and Unsupervised Machine Learning Algorithms on Consumer Reviews","authors":"Kartika Makkar, Pardeep Kumar, Monika Poriye, Shalini Aggarwal","doi":"10.1109/AIC55036.2022.9848880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For any organization involving consumers, reviews and feedbacks are quite important. For this purpose, the bulk of data is generated from various social networking sites in terms of reviews and feedbacks. In order to understand consumer’s perception about an item, this research scrutinizes various supervised and unsupervised machine learning algorithms on two data sets. A comparative analysis is made for deliberating the efficiency of these algorithms on distinct datasets for text classification. This research is an attempt to find the best fit classifier for consumer’s perception using sentiment analysis. So, in order to accomplish this objective, firstly text preprocessing techniques are applied on datasets then feature extraction techniques are applied on the processed data. Thereafter, classification and clustering are applied using supervised and unsupervised machine learning algorithms respectively. Further, these algorithms are evaluated and the result reveals that supervised machine learning algorithms especially Support Vector Machine (SVM) outperforms unsupervised machine learning algorithms for garments dataset. And Naive Bayes (NB), Logistic Regression (LR) outperforms unsupervised machine learning algorithms for restaurant dataset.","PeriodicalId":433590,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE World Conference on Applied Intelligence and Computing (AIC)","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE World Conference on Applied Intelligence and Computing (AIC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AIC55036.2022.9848880","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For any organization involving consumers, reviews and feedbacks are quite important. For this purpose, the bulk of data is generated from various social networking sites in terms of reviews and feedbacks. In order to understand consumer’s perception about an item, this research scrutinizes various supervised and unsupervised machine learning algorithms on two data sets. A comparative analysis is made for deliberating the efficiency of these algorithms on distinct datasets for text classification. This research is an attempt to find the best fit classifier for consumer’s perception using sentiment analysis. So, in order to accomplish this objective, firstly text preprocessing techniques are applied on datasets then feature extraction techniques are applied on the processed data. Thereafter, classification and clustering are applied using supervised and unsupervised machine learning algorithms respectively. Further, these algorithms are evaluated and the result reveals that supervised machine learning algorithms especially Support Vector Machine (SVM) outperforms unsupervised machine learning algorithms for garments dataset. And Naive Bayes (NB), Logistic Regression (LR) outperforms unsupervised machine learning algorithms for restaurant dataset.
有监督与无监督机器学习算法在消费者评论上的比较研究
对于任何涉及消费者的组织来说,评论和反馈都是非常重要的。为此,大量数据以评论和反馈的形式从各种社交网站生成。为了了解消费者对商品的看法,本研究在两个数据集上仔细研究了各种监督和无监督机器学习算法。对比分析了这些算法在不同数据集上的文本分类效率。本研究试图利用情感分析找到消费者感知的最佳匹配分类器。因此,为了实现这一目标,首先对数据集应用文本预处理技术,然后对处理后的数据应用特征提取技术。然后,分别使用有监督和无监督机器学习算法进行分类和聚类。此外,对这些算法进行了评估,结果表明有监督的机器学习算法,特别是支持向量机(SVM)在服装数据集上优于无监督的机器学习算法。朴素贝叶斯(NB)、逻辑回归(LR)在餐馆数据集上的表现优于无监督机器学习算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信