Collaboration between Competitors' NPD Teams: In Search of Effective Modes of Management Control

Lydie P. M. Smets, F. Langerak, Mohan V. Tatikonda
{"title":"Collaboration between Competitors' NPD Teams: In Search of Effective Modes of Management Control","authors":"Lydie P. M. Smets, F. Langerak, Mohan V. Tatikonda","doi":"10.1111/radm.12156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Successful collaboration between new product development (NPD) teams maintained by competitors (so-called horizontal NPD collaboration) requires the use of formal modes of management control that simultaneously coordinate the teams' interdependent development activities and encourage their cooperative behavior. Nevertheless, prior theoretical and empirical research suggests that formal control modes required to improve coordination may also drive uncooperative, opportunistic behavior. To help managers in horizontal NPD collaborations select appropriate control modes, this study draws on organizational theory of management control and develops a conceptual framework that specifies the impact of one partner's use of input, process, and output controls on the other partner's perception of coordination effectiveness and cooperative behavior. The results of a scenario-based experiment with 110 expert practitioners show that managers perceive the competitor's use of input control as harmful and process control as helpful for achieving coordination effectiveness. Moreover, managers respond positively to the competitor's use of input control and negatively to the competitor's use of output control when it comes to cooperative behavior. Together, the results indicate that no single mode of formal management control simultaneously enhances both coordination and cooperative behavior in horizontal NPD collaborations.","PeriodicalId":375570,"journal":{"name":"Diversification Strategy & Policy eJournal","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diversification Strategy & Policy eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

Successful collaboration between new product development (NPD) teams maintained by competitors (so-called horizontal NPD collaboration) requires the use of formal modes of management control that simultaneously coordinate the teams' interdependent development activities and encourage their cooperative behavior. Nevertheless, prior theoretical and empirical research suggests that formal control modes required to improve coordination may also drive uncooperative, opportunistic behavior. To help managers in horizontal NPD collaborations select appropriate control modes, this study draws on organizational theory of management control and develops a conceptual framework that specifies the impact of one partner's use of input, process, and output controls on the other partner's perception of coordination effectiveness and cooperative behavior. The results of a scenario-based experiment with 110 expert practitioners show that managers perceive the competitor's use of input control as harmful and process control as helpful for achieving coordination effectiveness. Moreover, managers respond positively to the competitor's use of input control and negatively to the competitor's use of output control when it comes to cooperative behavior. Together, the results indicate that no single mode of formal management control simultaneously enhances both coordination and cooperative behavior in horizontal NPD collaborations.
竞争对手新产品开发团队之间的合作:寻找有效的管理控制模式
竞争对手维持的新产品开发(NPD)团队之间的成功协作(所谓的水平NPD协作)需要使用正式的管理控制模式,同时协调团队相互依赖的开发活动并鼓励他们的合作行为。然而,先前的理论和实证研究表明,改善协调所需的正式控制模式也可能驱动不合作的机会主义行为。为了帮助横向新产品开发合作中的管理者选择合适的控制模式,本研究借鉴了管理控制的组织理论,并开发了一个概念框架,该框架规定了一方使用输入、过程和输出控制对另一方对协调有效性和合作行为的感知的影响。对110名专家从业人员进行的基于场景的实验结果表明,管理者认为竞争对手使用输入控制是有害的,而过程控制有助于实现协调有效性。此外,当涉及到合作行为时,管理者对竞争对手使用投入控制的反应是积极的,对竞争对手使用产出控制的反应是消极的。综上所述,没有一种正式的管理控制模式能够同时增强横向新产品开发协作中的协调和合作行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信