Correlation Between Frozen Section and Definitive Diagnosis in High-Risk Endometrial Carcinoma: Retrospective Analysis

Mine Özşen, Selin Yirmibeş, Fatma Öz Atalay
{"title":"Correlation Between Frozen Section and Definitive Diagnosis in High-Risk Endometrial Carcinoma: Retrospective Analysis","authors":"Mine Özşen, Selin Yirmibeş, Fatma Öz Atalay","doi":"10.5336/jcog.2021-85756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"examination in high-risk endometrial carcinoma cases. Material and Methods: In this retrospective study, the pathology archives of our center were evaluated and 90 high risk endometrial carcinoma cases that were examined intraoperatively, between 2005-2017 were analyzed. The following criteria were used to identify high-risk endometrial carcinoma cases: Grade 3 endometrioid carcinomas with lymphovascular invasion and/or myometrial invasion of more than half, tumors of stage 2, 3, 4 and non-endometrioid endometrial carcinoma. Results: Histopathological subtyping was accurate in 52 of the 57 cases of endometrioid carcinoma, 3 of the 20 cases of serous carcinoma and 1 of the 4 cases of clear cell carcinoma. None of the patients diagnosed with mixed carcinoma were accurately diagnosed in frozen section. When results of intraoperative and permenant evaluations were compared; 74.4% of the cases were compatible for histopathological subtype, 76.7% for grade, and 77.7% for myometrial invasion. Conclusion: In patients with high-risk endometrial carcinoma without a preoperative diagnosis, intraoperative evaluation is essential for determining prognostic parameters and performing surgical staging intraoperatively. Despite the careful evaluation of pathologists, the error rate is high in in- traoperative evaluation of high-risk endometrial carcinomas. In order to minimize the error rate, both gross and microscopical assessment should be performed with utmost care.","PeriodicalId":137134,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":"272 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5336/jcog.2021-85756","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

examination in high-risk endometrial carcinoma cases. Material and Methods: In this retrospective study, the pathology archives of our center were evaluated and 90 high risk endometrial carcinoma cases that were examined intraoperatively, between 2005-2017 were analyzed. The following criteria were used to identify high-risk endometrial carcinoma cases: Grade 3 endometrioid carcinomas with lymphovascular invasion and/or myometrial invasion of more than half, tumors of stage 2, 3, 4 and non-endometrioid endometrial carcinoma. Results: Histopathological subtyping was accurate in 52 of the 57 cases of endometrioid carcinoma, 3 of the 20 cases of serous carcinoma and 1 of the 4 cases of clear cell carcinoma. None of the patients diagnosed with mixed carcinoma were accurately diagnosed in frozen section. When results of intraoperative and permenant evaluations were compared; 74.4% of the cases were compatible for histopathological subtype, 76.7% for grade, and 77.7% for myometrial invasion. Conclusion: In patients with high-risk endometrial carcinoma without a preoperative diagnosis, intraoperative evaluation is essential for determining prognostic parameters and performing surgical staging intraoperatively. Despite the careful evaluation of pathologists, the error rate is high in in- traoperative evaluation of high-risk endometrial carcinomas. In order to minimize the error rate, both gross and microscopical assessment should be performed with utmost care.
高危子宫内膜癌冷冻切片与明确诊断的相关性:回顾性分析
高危子宫内膜癌的检查。材料与方法:回顾性分析我院2005-2017年术中检查的90例高危子宫内膜癌患者的病理资料。鉴别高危子宫内膜癌的标准如下:3级子宫内膜样癌伴淋巴血管浸润和/或肌层浸润超过一半,2、3、4期肿瘤和非子宫内膜样子宫内膜癌。结果:57例子宫内膜样癌中有52例、20例浆液性癌中有3例、4例透明细胞癌中有1例的组织病理学分型准确。诊断为混合性癌的患者,冷冻切片均未得到准确诊断。术中评价结果与术后评价结果比较;74.4%的病例符合组织病理学亚型,76.7%的病例符合分级,77.7%的病例符合肌层浸润。结论:对于术前未确诊的高危子宫内膜癌患者,术中评估对于确定预后参数和术中手术分期至关重要。尽管病理学家进行了仔细的评估,但高危子宫内膜癌术中评估的错误率很高。为了尽量减少错误率,肉眼和显微镜的评估都应该非常小心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信