{"title":"Desdemona moksham: A Shakespearean murder revisited","authors":"Arjun Raina","doi":"10.1386/itj_00018_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines two performances, Othello in Kathakali and The Magic Hour, concentrating the analysis around two different choices made around a single action: the killing of Desdemona. While Desdemona is killed in the Kathakali Othello, in The Magic Hour\n this does not occur. The argument in this article differs from a critique that suggests Othello in Kathakali, created by Sadanam Balakrishnan and performed by the International Center for Kathakali in New Delhi, fails to nuance the inherent misogyny in the original Shakespearean text\n while improvising on its own conventions. A sustained counter argument is presented, which suggests that the design of the performance has enough new elements, fresh codes and reinvented conventions to address the political/racial theme of the story, and that any misogyny inherently lies not\n in the creator’s intentions, but rather in the Shakespearean text itself. The Magic Hour, on the other hand, negotiates the misogyny in the Shakespearean text more directly and, by choosing not to kill Desdemona, transforms the murder sequence into a scene of liberation, of moksham.","PeriodicalId":293433,"journal":{"name":"Indian Theatre Journal","volume":"151 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Theatre Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/itj_00018_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article examines two performances, Othello in Kathakali and The Magic Hour, concentrating the analysis around two different choices made around a single action: the killing of Desdemona. While Desdemona is killed in the Kathakali Othello, in The Magic Hour
this does not occur. The argument in this article differs from a critique that suggests Othello in Kathakali, created by Sadanam Balakrishnan and performed by the International Center for Kathakali in New Delhi, fails to nuance the inherent misogyny in the original Shakespearean text
while improvising on its own conventions. A sustained counter argument is presented, which suggests that the design of the performance has enough new elements, fresh codes and reinvented conventions to address the political/racial theme of the story, and that any misogyny inherently lies not
in the creator’s intentions, but rather in the Shakespearean text itself. The Magic Hour, on the other hand, negotiates the misogyny in the Shakespearean text more directly and, by choosing not to kill Desdemona, transforms the murder sequence into a scene of liberation, of moksham.
这篇文章分析了两个表演,《奥赛罗在卡塔卡里》和《魔法时刻》,集中分析了两个不同的选择,围绕着一个动作:杀死苔丝狄蒙娜。虽然苔丝狄蒙娜在卡塔卡里剧《奥赛罗》中被杀,但在《魔法时刻》中却没有。这篇文章的论点不同于另一篇评论,该评论认为,由Sadanam Balakrishnan创作、由新德里国际卡塔卡里中心(International Center for Kathakali)演出的《奥赛罗》(Othello in Kathakali)未能在莎士比亚原作中对固有的厌女症进行细微的区分,而只是根据自己的惯例即兴创作。有人提出了一个持续的反驳论点,认为表演的设计有足够的新元素、新规范和重新发明的惯例来解决故事的政治/种族主题,任何厌女症都不是创作者的意图,而是莎士比亚的文本本身。另一方面,《魔法时刻》更直接地讨论了莎士比亚文本中的厌女症,通过选择不杀死苔丝狄蒙娜,将谋杀序列转变为解放的场景。