Perspectives of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy in terms of primary ovarian cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis treatment

A. Dzasokhov, A. Kostin, V. Astashov, A. Turiev, A. Uskov
{"title":"Perspectives of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy in terms of primary ovarian cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis treatment","authors":"A. Dzasokhov, A. Kostin, V. Astashov, A. Turiev, A. Uskov","doi":"10.17709/2410-1893-2023-10-1-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The relevance of the problem of increasing the effectiveness of standard treatment of ovarian cancer is determined by the following characteristics of the disease: high one‑year mortality, high recurrence rate and unsatisfactory results of their treatment. Peritoneal carcinomatosis in ovarian cancer occurs in 65–70 % of cases. The standard modern approach to the treatment of ovarian cancer is a combination of surgical treatment and systemic intravenous chemotherapy. At the same time, more than 70 % of ovarian cancer cases are first diagnosed at stages III–IV. However, despite the successes in the field of surgery and drug treatment, the five‑year survival rate is no more than 24 % at the III and 4.6 % at the IV stage of the disease. One of the frontiers of ovarian cancer resistance to therapy is peritoneal carcinomatosis. Its resistance to therapy is due to the low bioavailability of cytostatics in metastases on the peritoneum to almost zero. In order to increase bioavailability, various forms of intra‑abdominal chemotherapy are used. The technique of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) has a number of advantages over other methods of intra‑abdominal antitumor treatment. These advantages include the uniform distribution of cytostatics over the peritoneum, the absence of penetration of cytostatics beyond the peritoneum, which allows PIPAC to be combined with systemic chemotherapy, low trauma and good tolerability of the procedure. PIPAC was implemented into clinical practice in 2011, and since then has been widely used in a number of foreign and domestic clinics. The conducted studies confirm the safety of the technique and its effectiveness against peritoneal carcinomatosis. The data of multicenter studies and the analysis of available literature data, as well as the successful own experience of PIPAC use create prerequisites for investigating the effectiveness of intra‑abdominal aerosol chemotherapy under pressure in relation to peritoneal carcinomatosis in ovarian cancer.","PeriodicalId":334809,"journal":{"name":"Research and Practical Medicine Journal","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Practical Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17709/2410-1893-2023-10-1-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The relevance of the problem of increasing the effectiveness of standard treatment of ovarian cancer is determined by the following characteristics of the disease: high one‑year mortality, high recurrence rate and unsatisfactory results of their treatment. Peritoneal carcinomatosis in ovarian cancer occurs in 65–70 % of cases. The standard modern approach to the treatment of ovarian cancer is a combination of surgical treatment and systemic intravenous chemotherapy. At the same time, more than 70 % of ovarian cancer cases are first diagnosed at stages III–IV. However, despite the successes in the field of surgery and drug treatment, the five‑year survival rate is no more than 24 % at the III and 4.6 % at the IV stage of the disease. One of the frontiers of ovarian cancer resistance to therapy is peritoneal carcinomatosis. Its resistance to therapy is due to the low bioavailability of cytostatics in metastases on the peritoneum to almost zero. In order to increase bioavailability, various forms of intra‑abdominal chemotherapy are used. The technique of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) has a number of advantages over other methods of intra‑abdominal antitumor treatment. These advantages include the uniform distribution of cytostatics over the peritoneum, the absence of penetration of cytostatics beyond the peritoneum, which allows PIPAC to be combined with systemic chemotherapy, low trauma and good tolerability of the procedure. PIPAC was implemented into clinical practice in 2011, and since then has been widely used in a number of foreign and domestic clinics. The conducted studies confirm the safety of the technique and its effectiveness against peritoneal carcinomatosis. The data of multicenter studies and the analysis of available literature data, as well as the successful own experience of PIPAC use create prerequisites for investigating the effectiveness of intra‑abdominal aerosol chemotherapy under pressure in relation to peritoneal carcinomatosis in ovarian cancer.
原发性卵巢癌伴腹膜癌的雾化加压化疗治疗前景
提高卵巢癌标准治疗有效性问题的相关性取决于该疾病的以下特点:1年死亡率高、复发率高和治疗效果不理想。腹膜癌在卵巢癌中的发病率为65 - 70%。治疗卵巢癌的标准现代方法是手术治疗和全身静脉化疗的结合。与此同时,超过70%的卵巢癌病例在第三至第四阶段被首次诊断出来。然而,尽管在手术和药物治疗方面取得了成功,但该疾病三期和四期的五年生存率分别不超过24%和4.6%。卵巢癌耐药治疗的前沿之一是腹膜癌。它对治疗的抵抗是由于在腹膜转移的细胞抑制剂的生物利用度很低,几乎为零。为了提高生物利用度,使用了各种形式的腹腔化疗。与其他腹腔内抗肿瘤治疗方法相比,加压腹腔内气溶胶化疗(PIPAC)技术具有许多优点。这些优点包括细胞抑制剂在腹膜上均匀分布,细胞抑制剂不会渗透到腹膜之外,这使得PIPAC可以与全身化疗联合使用,创伤小,手术耐受性好。PIPAC于2011年投入临床实践,目前已在国内外多家诊所广泛应用。所进行的研究证实了该技术的安全性及其对腹膜癌病的有效性。多中心研究的数据和对现有文献数据的分析,以及自身使用PIPAC的成功经验,为研究压力下腹腔内气雾剂化疗与卵巢癌腹膜癌病变的有效性创造了先决条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信