The Qur’anic Calf Episode Between Orientalism and Islamic Tradition

Michael E. Pregill
{"title":"The Qur’anic Calf Episode Between Orientalism and Islamic Tradition","authors":"Michael E. Pregill","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198852421.003.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter discusses the qur’anic Golden Calf episode as it is traditionally interpreted in both Muslim exegesis and Western scholarship. The qur’anic references to the image worshipped by the Israelites are usually understood as depicting the Calf as alive or at least possessing some semblance of life—as ? lowing image of a calf, as the Qur’an puts it. Further, the Qur’an seems to posit that the Calf was made and animated by a character called al-sāmirī—the “Samaritan”—and not Aaron as in the biblical story. Western scholars and traditional Muslim commentators have always agreed on this interpretation of the qur’anic version of the episode. However, this chapter shows that Western scholars have generally relied upon the explanation of the episode in Muslim exegesis or tafsīr, misunderstanding the role that early Muslim commentators played in introducing a radical revision of the story that was quite different in major details from the account found in the Qur’an itself. This can be demonstrated by examining historical translations of the Qur’an in the West, beginning with some of the earliest translations and commentaries of the medieval and early modern periods in Europe. In the specific case of the Calf narrative, Western scholars’ reliance on tafsīr has typically been motivated not by a desire to validate the claims of Muslim authorities, but rather by the assumption that Islam is at its root thoroughly dependent upon Judaism. This assumption has colored not only the overarching approach to the qur’anic narrative per se, but also the characterization of a number of rabbinic traditions that have been cited as the sources of that narrative.","PeriodicalId":255162,"journal":{"name":"The Golden Calf between Bible and Qur'an","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Golden Calf between Bible and Qur'an","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198852421.003.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter discusses the qur’anic Golden Calf episode as it is traditionally interpreted in both Muslim exegesis and Western scholarship. The qur’anic references to the image worshipped by the Israelites are usually understood as depicting the Calf as alive or at least possessing some semblance of life—as ? lowing image of a calf, as the Qur’an puts it. Further, the Qur’an seems to posit that the Calf was made and animated by a character called al-sāmirī—the “Samaritan”—and not Aaron as in the biblical story. Western scholars and traditional Muslim commentators have always agreed on this interpretation of the qur’anic version of the episode. However, this chapter shows that Western scholars have generally relied upon the explanation of the episode in Muslim exegesis or tafsīr, misunderstanding the role that early Muslim commentators played in introducing a radical revision of the story that was quite different in major details from the account found in the Qur’an itself. This can be demonstrated by examining historical translations of the Qur’an in the West, beginning with some of the earliest translations and commentaries of the medieval and early modern periods in Europe. In the specific case of the Calf narrative, Western scholars’ reliance on tafsīr has typically been motivated not by a desire to validate the claims of Muslim authorities, but rather by the assumption that Islam is at its root thoroughly dependent upon Judaism. This assumption has colored not only the overarching approach to the qur’anic narrative per se, but also the characterization of a number of rabbinic traditions that have been cited as the sources of that narrative.
东方主义与伊斯兰传统之间的古兰经小插曲
本章讨论古兰经的金牛犊事件,因为它在穆斯林训诂学和西方学者中都有传统的解释。《古兰经》中提到的以色列人所崇拜的形象通常被理解为将牛犊描绘成活着的,或者至少拥有一些生命的表象。正如《古兰经》中所说的那样,这是一头低沉的牛犊。此外,《古兰经》似乎假定牛犊是由一个名叫al-sāmirī-the的“撒玛利亚人”的人物制作和动画的,而不是圣经故事中的亚伦。西方学者和传统的穆斯林评论家一直同意这种对古兰经版本的解释。然而,这一章表明,西方学者通常依赖于穆斯林释经或tafs ā r对这一事件的解释,误解了早期穆斯林注释家在引入对故事的激进修订方面所起的作用,这些故事在主要细节上与古兰经本身的描述大不相同。这可以通过检查西方古兰经的历史翻译来证明,从欧洲中世纪和早期现代时期的一些最早的翻译和评论开始。在卡夫叙述的具体案例中,西方学者对塔夫斯基的依赖通常不是出于验证穆斯林权威主张的愿望,而是出于伊斯兰教从根本上完全依赖犹太教的假设。这一假设不仅影响了古兰经叙事本身的总体方法,也影响了一些拉比传统的特征,这些传统被引用为古兰经叙事的来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信