Tune-in and Time-out: Toward Surgeon-Led Prevention of "Never" Events.

Niall M Jones
{"title":"Tune-in and Time-out: Toward Surgeon-Led Prevention of \"Never\" Events.","authors":"Niall M Jones","doi":"10.1097/PTS.0000000000000259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\nThe World Health Organization (WHO) distributed a surgical safety checklist in 2008 in a bid to improve patient safety and quality of care in the operating theater. Adherence to the checklist has been shown to reduce \"never\" events, for example, wrong site surgery. The aim of this quality improvement study was to determine the current adherence by surgeons to the checklist at The Royal Hobart Hospital.\n\n\nMETHODS\nThis is a retrospective audit of the digital medical records of 100 consecutive emergency operations performed at The Royal Hobart Hospital. The time-out section of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist was assessed for completeness. Second, an anonymized survey of theater nursing staff was performed to determine current adherence by surgeons with the time-out.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe time-out was completed in 79% of emergency procedures. There were no never events in the patient cohort studied. There was overwhelming support among theater nurses for a surgeon-led time-out. Formal education on the use of the WHO Safe Surgery Checklist is lacking. Most theater nurses have experienced hostility from surgeons when conducting a time-out.\n\n\nDISCUSSION\nThis work is a step on the way to surgeon-led prevention of never events. Finding a completed time-out in the patient notes does not guarantee surgeon support for or contribution to the time-out process. The findings will inform combined nursing and surgeon education sessions, and together with executive-level support, improved surgeon cooperation with the time-out will inculcate a culture of safety for patients and improve harmony among staff groups.","PeriodicalId":206245,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Patient Safety","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Patient Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000000259","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

INTRODUCTION The World Health Organization (WHO) distributed a surgical safety checklist in 2008 in a bid to improve patient safety and quality of care in the operating theater. Adherence to the checklist has been shown to reduce "never" events, for example, wrong site surgery. The aim of this quality improvement study was to determine the current adherence by surgeons to the checklist at The Royal Hobart Hospital. METHODS This is a retrospective audit of the digital medical records of 100 consecutive emergency operations performed at The Royal Hobart Hospital. The time-out section of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist was assessed for completeness. Second, an anonymized survey of theater nursing staff was performed to determine current adherence by surgeons with the time-out. RESULTS The time-out was completed in 79% of emergency procedures. There were no never events in the patient cohort studied. There was overwhelming support among theater nurses for a surgeon-led time-out. Formal education on the use of the WHO Safe Surgery Checklist is lacking. Most theater nurses have experienced hostility from surgeons when conducting a time-out. DISCUSSION This work is a step on the way to surgeon-led prevention of never events. Finding a completed time-out in the patient notes does not guarantee surgeon support for or contribution to the time-out process. The findings will inform combined nursing and surgeon education sessions, and together with executive-level support, improved surgeon cooperation with the time-out will inculcate a culture of safety for patients and improve harmony among staff groups.
调整和暂停:外科医生主导的“从不”事件的预防。
世界卫生组织(世卫组织)于2008年分发了一份手术安全清单,以提高手术室患者的安全和护理质量。遵守检查表已被证明可以减少“从未”发生的事件,例如,错误的手术部位。本质量改进研究的目的是确定目前皇家霍巴特医院外科医生对检查表的遵守情况。方法对皇家霍巴特医院连续100例急诊手术的数字医疗记录进行回顾性审计。对WHO手术安全检查表的暂停部分进行完整性评估。其次,对手术室护理人员进行匿名调查,以确定暂停手术的外科医生目前的依从性。结果79%的急诊病人完成了暂停治疗。在研究的患者队列中没有从未发生过事件。手术室护士压倒性地支持由外科医生领导的暂停。缺乏关于使用世卫组织安全手术清单的正规教育。大多数手术室护士在执行暂停时都经历过外科医生的敌意。这项工作是外科医生主导的预防从未发生过的事件的一步。在病人笔记中找到完整的暂停并不能保证外科医生支持或参与暂停过程。研究结果将为护理和外科医生联合教育课程提供信息,并与行政层面的支持一起,改善外科医生与暂停的合作,将为患者灌输安全文化,并改善工作人员群体之间的和谐。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信