Multichannel data for understanding cognitive affordances during complex problem solving

Charlotte Larmuseau, Pieter Vanneste, P. Desmet, F. Depaepe
{"title":"Multichannel data for understanding cognitive affordances during complex problem solving","authors":"Charlotte Larmuseau, Pieter Vanneste, P. Desmet, F. Depaepe","doi":"10.1145/3303772.3303778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This exploratory study challenges the current practices in cognitive load measurement by using multichannel data to investigate cognitive load affordances during online complex problem solving. Moreover, it is an attempt to investigate how cognitive load is related to strategy use. Accordingly, in the current study a well- and an ill-structured problem were developed in a virtual learning environment. Online support was provided. Participants were 15 students from the teacher training program. This study incorporated subjective measurements of students' cognitive load (i.e., intrinsic, extraneous, germane load and their mental effort) combined with physiological data containing galvanic skin response (GSR) and skin temperature (ST). A first aim was to investigate whether there was a significant difference for the subjective measurements, physiological data and consultation of support between the well-and ill-structured problem. Secondly this study investigated how individual differences of subjective measurements are related to individual differences of physiological data and consultation of support. Results reveal significant differences for intrinsic load, mental effort between a well- and ill-structured problem. Moreover, when investigating individual differences, findings reveal that GSR might be related to mental effort. Additionally, results indicate that cognitive load influences strategy use. Future research with larger sample sizes should verify these findings in order to have more insight into how we can measure cognitive load and how its related to self-directed learning. These insights should allow us to provide adaptive support in virtual learning environments.","PeriodicalId":382957,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3303772.3303778","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

This exploratory study challenges the current practices in cognitive load measurement by using multichannel data to investigate cognitive load affordances during online complex problem solving. Moreover, it is an attempt to investigate how cognitive load is related to strategy use. Accordingly, in the current study a well- and an ill-structured problem were developed in a virtual learning environment. Online support was provided. Participants were 15 students from the teacher training program. This study incorporated subjective measurements of students' cognitive load (i.e., intrinsic, extraneous, germane load and their mental effort) combined with physiological data containing galvanic skin response (GSR) and skin temperature (ST). A first aim was to investigate whether there was a significant difference for the subjective measurements, physiological data and consultation of support between the well-and ill-structured problem. Secondly this study investigated how individual differences of subjective measurements are related to individual differences of physiological data and consultation of support. Results reveal significant differences for intrinsic load, mental effort between a well- and ill-structured problem. Moreover, when investigating individual differences, findings reveal that GSR might be related to mental effort. Additionally, results indicate that cognitive load influences strategy use. Future research with larger sample sizes should verify these findings in order to have more insight into how we can measure cognitive load and how its related to self-directed learning. These insights should allow us to provide adaptive support in virtual learning environments.
多通道数据用于理解复杂问题解决过程中的认知能力
本探索性研究通过使用多通道数据来调查在线复杂问题解决过程中的认知负荷能力,挑战了当前认知负荷测量的实践。此外,本研究还试图探讨认知负荷与策略使用之间的关系。因此,在当前的研究中,在虚拟学习环境中开发了一个结构良好和一个结构不良的问题。提供在线支持。参与者是教师培训项目的15名学生。本研究将学生的认知负荷(即内在负荷、外在负荷、相关负荷和脑力劳动)的主观测量与皮肤电反应(GSR)和皮肤温度(ST)的生理数据相结合。第一个目的是调查结构良好和结构不良的问题在主观测量、生理数据和咨询支持方面是否存在显著差异。其次,本研究探讨了主观测量的个体差异与生理数据和支持咨询的个体差异之间的关系。结果显示,在结构良好和结构不良的问题中,内在负荷、心理努力存在显著差异。此外,在调查个体差异时,研究结果显示GSR可能与心理努力有关。此外,研究结果表明,认知负荷影响策略的使用。未来更大样本量的研究应该验证这些发现,以便更深入地了解我们如何测量认知负荷及其与自主学习的关系。这些见解应该允许我们在虚拟学习环境中提供适应性支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信