Validazione e standardizzazione del questionario «Dimmi come leggi». Il questionario per misurare le strategie di lettura nella scuola secondaria di primo grado

G. Castellana
{"title":"Validazione e standardizzazione del questionario «Dimmi come leggi». Il questionario per misurare le strategie di lettura nella scuola secondaria di primo grado","authors":"G. Castellana","doi":"10.7358/ecps-2018-018-cast","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study explores the structural validity of the first Italian questionnaire on reading strategies («Tell me how you read») for the lower secondary school. The areas investigated by the questionnaire refer to six strategic areas known to be effective by several international studies (NICHD, 2000; RAND, 2002; IRA, 2003; Rapporto Eurydice, 2011). The Questionnaire has been validated using a convenience sample of 5362 students of lower secondary schools in Rome, Palermo and Parma. Findings of the confirmative Factor Analysis demonstrated the hypothesized model fits data for the seven dimensions: Knowing how to identify reading purposes; Activating prior knowledge; Making predictions hypothesis about text; Selecting information, Making short summaries of the text; Using text graphic organizers to understand, remember and make connections between information; Controlling and monitoring the process of understanding; Struggling students (a dimension which contains control items about the perception of the difficulties the subject encounters during reading). After the validation the questionnaire has been standardized. The questionnaire has been used in a longitudinal survey on reading (three years of secondary school level), which involved a sample of 359 students (Castellana, 2017). The findings showed significant correlations between the scores of the questionnaire with reading comprehension tests, confirming the hypothesis that the use of reading strategies is a discriminating variable for the students who rank in the highest scores and vice versa.","PeriodicalId":175961,"journal":{"name":"ECPS - Educational Cultural and Psychological Studies","volume":"308 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ECPS - Educational Cultural and Psychological Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7358/ecps-2018-018-cast","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study explores the structural validity of the first Italian questionnaire on reading strategies («Tell me how you read») for the lower secondary school. The areas investigated by the questionnaire refer to six strategic areas known to be effective by several international studies (NICHD, 2000; RAND, 2002; IRA, 2003; Rapporto Eurydice, 2011). The Questionnaire has been validated using a convenience sample of 5362 students of lower secondary schools in Rome, Palermo and Parma. Findings of the confirmative Factor Analysis demonstrated the hypothesized model fits data for the seven dimensions: Knowing how to identify reading purposes; Activating prior knowledge; Making predictions hypothesis about text; Selecting information, Making short summaries of the text; Using text graphic organizers to understand, remember and make connections between information; Controlling and monitoring the process of understanding; Struggling students (a dimension which contains control items about the perception of the difficulties the subject encounters during reading). After the validation the questionnaire has been standardized. The questionnaire has been used in a longitudinal survey on reading (three years of secondary school level), which involved a sample of 359 students (Castellana, 2017). The findings showed significant correlations between the scores of the questionnaire with reading comprehension tests, confirming the hypothesis that the use of reading strategies is a discriminating variable for the students who rank in the highest scores and vice versa.
“告诉我你是怎么读的”问卷的验证和标准化。第一中学阅读策略量度问卷
本研究探讨了第一份意大利语初中阅读策略问卷(“告诉我你是如何阅读的”)的结构效度。调查表所调查的领域涉及若干国际研究表明有效的六个战略领域(人口与发展中心,2000年;兰德,2002;爱尔兰共和军,2003;Rapporto Eurydice, 2011)。问卷采用罗马、巴勒莫和帕尔马的5362名初中学生作为方便样本进行验证。确认性因子分析的结果表明,假设模型在七个维度上符合数据:知道如何识别阅读目的;激活先验知识;对文本进行预测假设;选择信息,对文本进行简短的总结;使用文本图形组织来理解、记忆和建立信息之间的联系;控制和监测理解过程;挣扎的学生(一个维度,包含关于受试者在阅读过程中遇到的困难的感知的控制项目)。验证后,问卷被标准化。该问卷已用于一项关于阅读(三年中学水平)的纵向调查,该调查涉及359名学生的样本(Castellana, 2017)。研究结果表明,调查问卷的得分与阅读理解测试之间存在显著的相关性,证实了阅读策略的使用对于得分最高的学生来说是一个判别变量,反之亦然。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信