Technological Singularity as a Point of No Return: Back to the Future? (Philosophical Legal View)

A. Popova, В ПоповаА, M. Abramova, Г АбрамоваМ
{"title":"Technological Singularity as a Point of No Return: Back to the Future? (Philosophical Legal View)","authors":"A. Popova, В ПоповаА, M. Abramova, Г АбрамоваМ","doi":"10.17816/rjls18378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors offer their views on the processes of establishing and developing worldwide digital technologies of intruding in human civilization. The world is now witnessing the creation of a wide range of cyber-physical systems, different types of robots, artificial intellects, robot-engineering units, intellectual and brain systems. Because of this, there is an imperative need to resolve all the different philosophical, legal, political and moral problems that have come to the surface.We may ask: how can these new types of intellects, these so-called «post-humans» interact with Homo sapiens? Do they have a conscience, and are they, in this case, subjects of law? By the actions of humanoids, androids, hynoids, different types of industrial and social robots, is it possible to speak about their empathy, responsibility for what they do from the point of view of moral dogmas and norms of law?It is noteworthy that the current development of brain-computer interface based on direct contact between human and computer consciousness will have an impact on changing the concepts of democracy, rights and freedoms, equality, justice and religious convictions.The article offers a brief analysis of the philosophy of trans-humanism. Having reached the point of technological singularity from which it will no longer be possible to return to the past. Therefore, technological singularity is that critical point for mankind which can lead to self-liquidation. The only possible way to exclude such a pessimistic future for the whole of mankind is to pool the efforts of the community, by upgrading the role of collective start- ups, common interests and social interests as a special universal boon.Only by coordinating and harmonizing public, collective interests, the interests of Man and Nature, will it be possible to begin elaborating general norms for helping us to regulate new public relationships with this technological element.","PeriodicalId":223654,"journal":{"name":"Russian Journal of Legal Studies","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian Journal of Legal Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17816/rjls18378","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The authors offer their views on the processes of establishing and developing worldwide digital technologies of intruding in human civilization. The world is now witnessing the creation of a wide range of cyber-physical systems, different types of robots, artificial intellects, robot-engineering units, intellectual and brain systems. Because of this, there is an imperative need to resolve all the different philosophical, legal, political and moral problems that have come to the surface.We may ask: how can these new types of intellects, these so-called «post-humans» interact with Homo sapiens? Do they have a conscience, and are they, in this case, subjects of law? By the actions of humanoids, androids, hynoids, different types of industrial and social robots, is it possible to speak about their empathy, responsibility for what they do from the point of view of moral dogmas and norms of law?It is noteworthy that the current development of brain-computer interface based on direct contact between human and computer consciousness will have an impact on changing the concepts of democracy, rights and freedoms, equality, justice and religious convictions.The article offers a brief analysis of the philosophy of trans-humanism. Having reached the point of technological singularity from which it will no longer be possible to return to the past. Therefore, technological singularity is that critical point for mankind which can lead to self-liquidation. The only possible way to exclude such a pessimistic future for the whole of mankind is to pool the efforts of the community, by upgrading the role of collective start- ups, common interests and social interests as a special universal boon.Only by coordinating and harmonizing public, collective interests, the interests of Man and Nature, will it be possible to begin elaborating general norms for helping us to regulate new public relationships with this technological element.
技术奇点是不归路:回到未来?(哲学法学观点)
作者对侵入人类文明的全球数字技术的建立和发展过程提出了自己的看法。当今世界正在见证各种网络物理系统、不同类型的机器人、人工智能、机器人工程单元、智力和大脑系统的创建。正因为如此,迫切需要解决所有浮出水面的不同的哲学、法律、政治和道德问题。我们可能会问:这些新型的智人,这些所谓的“后人类”是如何与智人互动的?他们有良心吗?在这种情况下,他们是法律的主体吗?通过类人机器人,机器人,hynoids,不同类型的工业和社交机器人的行为,是否有可能从道德教条和法律规范的角度来谈论他们的同理心,对他们所做的事情的责任?值得注意的是,目前基于人与计算机意识直接接触的脑机接口的发展,将对改变民主、权利和自由、平等、正义和宗教信仰等概念产生影响。本文对跨人文主义哲学作了简要分析。已经达到了技术奇点,从此再也不可能回到过去。因此,技术奇点是人类走向自我清算的临界点。为全人类排除这种悲观未来的唯一可能方法是通过提升集体创业、共同利益和社会利益的作用,将其作为一种特殊的普遍福利,来汇集社区的努力。只有通过协调和协调公共的、集体的利益、人与自然的利益,才有可能开始制定一般准则,帮助我们管理与这一技术因素有关的新的公共关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信