The Knowledge and Attitudes of The Non-Health Worker Citizens and Physicians About Traditional and Complementary Medicine: A Cross-Sectional Study

Reyhan Tekin, S. Gorpelioglu, C. Aypak, Ozlem Suvak, C. Emiroğlu
{"title":"The Knowledge and Attitudes of The Non-Health Worker Citizens and Physicians About Traditional and Complementary Medicine: A Cross-Sectional Study","authors":"Reyhan Tekin, S. Gorpelioglu, C. Aypak, Ozlem Suvak, C. Emiroğlu","doi":"10.33880/ejfm.2021100301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: Healthcare professionals will set an example to society with their behaviors about Traditional and Complementary Medicine usage. We aimed to investigate and compare the knowledge and attitudes of society and physicians about Traditional and Complementary Medicine to create an infrastructure for medical training.\n\nMethods: In this cross-sectional descriptive study \"Turkish Version of Complementary, Alternative and Conventional Medicine Attitude Scale\" was used for data collection.\n\nResults: A total of 392 physicians and 438 citizens participated in the study. Among all participants, 36.9% had used a Traditional and Complementary Medicine method before and the most used method was phytotherapy. There was a significant difference between groups in terms of the level of knowledge. Surprisingly no significant difference was found between physicians and the public in the \"Dissatisfaction with Modern Medicine\" subgroup.\n\nConclusion: Although there were differences in the level of knowledge between the public and physicians, it was seen that the behavioral patterns were similar to each other. This situation suggests that physicians are also influenced by the society they live in, rather than scientific data, in their decisions about Traditional and Complementary Medicine. Being as a role model to the public, physicians are responsible for providing evidence-based answers to questions about Traditional and Complementary Medicine and should receive adequate training about methods.\n\nKeywords: complementary medicine, therapeutic use, evidence-based practice, knowledge, physicians","PeriodicalId":436322,"journal":{"name":"Eurasian Journal of Family Medicine","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurasian Journal of Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33880/ejfm.2021100301","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Aim: Healthcare professionals will set an example to society with their behaviors about Traditional and Complementary Medicine usage. We aimed to investigate and compare the knowledge and attitudes of society and physicians about Traditional and Complementary Medicine to create an infrastructure for medical training. Methods: In this cross-sectional descriptive study "Turkish Version of Complementary, Alternative and Conventional Medicine Attitude Scale" was used for data collection. Results: A total of 392 physicians and 438 citizens participated in the study. Among all participants, 36.9% had used a Traditional and Complementary Medicine method before and the most used method was phytotherapy. There was a significant difference between groups in terms of the level of knowledge. Surprisingly no significant difference was found between physicians and the public in the "Dissatisfaction with Modern Medicine" subgroup. Conclusion: Although there were differences in the level of knowledge between the public and physicians, it was seen that the behavioral patterns were similar to each other. This situation suggests that physicians are also influenced by the society they live in, rather than scientific data, in their decisions about Traditional and Complementary Medicine. Being as a role model to the public, physicians are responsible for providing evidence-based answers to questions about Traditional and Complementary Medicine and should receive adequate training about methods. Keywords: complementary medicine, therapeutic use, evidence-based practice, knowledge, physicians
非卫生工作者公民和医生对传统和补充医学的知识和态度:一项横断面研究
目的:医疗保健专业人员将以其传统和补充医学的使用行为为社会树立榜样。我们的目的是调查和比较社会和医生对传统医学和补充医学的知识和态度,以建立医疗培训的基础设施。方法:采用“土耳其版补充、替代和传统医学态度量表”进行横断面描述性研究。结果:共有392名医生和438名市民参与了研究。在所有参与者中,36.9%的人以前使用过传统和补充医学方法,最常用的方法是植物疗法。在知识水平方面,两组之间存在显著差异。令人惊讶的是,在“对现代医学不满意”这一分组中,医生和公众之间没有发现显著差异。结论:虽然公众与医生在知识水平上存在差异,但其行为模式具有相似性。这种情况表明,医生在对传统医学和补充医学作出决定时,也受到他们所处社会的影响,而不是受到科学数据的影响。作为公众的榜样,医生有责任为有关传统和补充医学的问题提供基于证据的答案,并应接受有关方法的充分培训。关键词:补充医学,治疗用途,循证实践,知识,医生
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信