The direct and immediate link test regarding deduction of input VAT: a consumption-based test versus an economic-based test?

D. Jensen, Henrik Stensgaard
{"title":"The direct and immediate link test regarding deduction of input VAT: a consumption-based test versus an economic-based test?","authors":"D. Jensen, Henrik Stensgaard","doi":"10.5235/20488432.3.2.71","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It follows explicitly from the EC VAT Directive that the deduction of input VAT depends on a positive link between on the one hand the incurred expenses and on the other hand the planned or actually completed taxed output transactions. In theory and in practice, however, the deeper nature of this link constantly gives rise to uncertainty, and thus also uncertainty in relation to the necessary distinction between direct costs and overhead costs. The purpose of this article is to analyse the recent case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union (ECJ) with a view to assessing the status of the relevant test used when establishing the link between a taxable person's different input and output transactions.","PeriodicalId":114680,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of VAT/GST Law","volume":"158 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of VAT/GST Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5235/20488432.3.2.71","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

It follows explicitly from the EC VAT Directive that the deduction of input VAT depends on a positive link between on the one hand the incurred expenses and on the other hand the planned or actually completed taxed output transactions. In theory and in practice, however, the deeper nature of this link constantly gives rise to uncertainty, and thus also uncertainty in relation to the necessary distinction between direct costs and overhead costs. The purpose of this article is to analyse the recent case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union (ECJ) with a view to assessing the status of the relevant test used when establishing the link between a taxable person's different input and output transactions.
关于抵扣进项增值税的直接联系检验:以消费为基础的检验还是以经济为基础的检验?
欧盟增值税指令明确指出,进项增值税的扣除取决于两者之间的积极联系,一方面是发生的费用,另一方面是计划或实际完成的纳税产出交易。然而,在理论和实践中,这种联系的深层性质不断产生不确定性,因此也不确定直接成本和间接成本之间的必要区别。本文的目的是分析欧盟法院(ECJ)最近的判例法,以评估在建立应税人的不同投入和产出交易之间的联系时使用的相关测试的状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信