Inadvertent File Sharing Over Peer-to-Peer Networks: How it Endangers Citizens and Jeopardizes National Security, Testimony Before the U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

T. Sydnor
{"title":"Inadvertent File Sharing Over Peer-to-Peer Networks: How it Endangers Citizens and Jeopardizes National Security, Testimony Before the U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform","authors":"T. Sydnor","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1443289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Certain distributors of popular file-sharing programs have repeatedly failed to prevent, and may have knowingly caused and perpetuated, inadvertent file-sharing, Inadvertent sharing cannot be remediated by self-regulation by distributors of file-sharing programs because certain distributors have repeatedly violated every set of self-regulations proposed - including a Code of Conduct and a set of Volutary Best Practices that they drafted. Three critical defects are present in every released version of the LimeWire 5 file-sharing program: (1) every version is dangerously unpredictable and can share all of a user's personal document, image, video, and audio files just by being installed, (2) every version violates critical provisions of the LimeWire's own Voluntary Best Practices, (3) every version contains a feature that LimeWire itself knew to be a needlessly dangerous of means of ensuring that one reasonable mistake by a child could inadvertently share thousands of a family's most sensitive personal files. In short, the problem of inadvertent sharing has persisted for nine years because distributors of file-sharing programs like LimeWire LLC have repeatedly responded to even the most serious and well-documented concerns about inadvertent sharing with half-measures, misrepresentations, whitewash, and other conduct that, considered in its entirety, could strongly suggest bad faith - an intent to cause and perpetuate inadvertent sharing. Consequently, the widespread, well-documented breaches of national, military, corporate, and family security caused by inadvertent sharing may be nothing more - or less - than the acceptable 'collateral damage' of schemes intended to trick users into sharing popular music and movies. Congress should pursue a two-pronged remedial strategy. First, this issue should be formally referred to law-enforcement agencies possessing relevant civil and criminal enforcement authority. And Congress should support efforts to amend H.R. 1319, The Informed P2P User Act, in order to grant the Federal Trade Commission additional targeted enforcement powers.","PeriodicalId":179517,"journal":{"name":"Information Privacy Law eJournal","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Privacy Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1443289","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Certain distributors of popular file-sharing programs have repeatedly failed to prevent, and may have knowingly caused and perpetuated, inadvertent file-sharing, Inadvertent sharing cannot be remediated by self-regulation by distributors of file-sharing programs because certain distributors have repeatedly violated every set of self-regulations proposed - including a Code of Conduct and a set of Volutary Best Practices that they drafted. Three critical defects are present in every released version of the LimeWire 5 file-sharing program: (1) every version is dangerously unpredictable and can share all of a user's personal document, image, video, and audio files just by being installed, (2) every version violates critical provisions of the LimeWire's own Voluntary Best Practices, (3) every version contains a feature that LimeWire itself knew to be a needlessly dangerous of means of ensuring that one reasonable mistake by a child could inadvertently share thousands of a family's most sensitive personal files. In short, the problem of inadvertent sharing has persisted for nine years because distributors of file-sharing programs like LimeWire LLC have repeatedly responded to even the most serious and well-documented concerns about inadvertent sharing with half-measures, misrepresentations, whitewash, and other conduct that, considered in its entirety, could strongly suggest bad faith - an intent to cause and perpetuate inadvertent sharing. Consequently, the widespread, well-documented breaches of national, military, corporate, and family security caused by inadvertent sharing may be nothing more - or less - than the acceptable 'collateral damage' of schemes intended to trick users into sharing popular music and movies. Congress should pursue a two-pronged remedial strategy. First, this issue should be formally referred to law-enforcement agencies possessing relevant civil and criminal enforcement authority. And Congress should support efforts to amend H.R. 1319, The Informed P2P User Act, in order to grant the Federal Trade Commission additional targeted enforcement powers.
在点对点网络上无意的文件共享:它如何危及公民和国家安全,在美国众议院监督和政府改革委员会面前的证词
某些流行的文件共享程序的分发者一再未能阻止,并可能故意造成和延续了无意的文件共享。无意的共享不能通过文件共享程序分发者的自我监管来纠正,因为某些分发者一再违反了每一套自我监管提议——包括他们起草的行为准则和一套自愿最佳实践。LimeWire 5文件共享程序的每个发布版本都存在三个关键缺陷:(1)每个版本都是危险的不可预测的,并且可以通过安装共享所有用户的个人文档,图像,视频和音频文件;(2)每个版本都违反了LimeWire自己的自愿最佳实践的关键条款;(3)每个版本都包含一个功能,LimeWire自己知道这是一个不必要的危险手段,以确保一个孩子的一个合理的错误可能无意中共享数千个家庭最敏感的个人文件。简而言之,无意共享的问题已经持续了9年,因为像LimeWire LLC这样的文件共享程序的分发者一再回应,即使是最严重的、有充分证据的关于无意共享的担忧,他们也会采取半措施、虚假陈述、粉饰和其他行为,从整体上看,这些行为可能强烈表明恶意——有意引起并延续无意共享。因此,由于无意的分享而导致的对国家、军事、企业和家庭安全的广泛的、有案可查的破坏,可能只是一种可接受的“附带损害”,即欺骗用户分享流行音乐和电影。国会应该采取双管齐下的补救策略。首先,这一问题应正式提交具有有关民事和刑事执法权力的执法机构。国会应该支持修订H.R. 1319《知情P2P用户法案》,以授予联邦贸易委员会额外的有针对性的执法权力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信