J. Tejedor, Javier Macias-Guarasa, H. Martins, D. Piote, J. Pastor-Graells, S. Martín-López, P. Corredera, G. De Pauw, F. De Smet, W. Postvoll, C. H. Ahlen, M. González-Herráez
{"title":"Towards detection of pipeline integrity threats using a SmarT fiber-OPtic surveillance system: PIT-STOP project blind field test results","authors":"J. Tejedor, Javier Macias-Guarasa, H. Martins, D. Piote, J. Pastor-Graells, S. Martín-López, P. Corredera, G. De Pauw, F. De Smet, W. Postvoll, C. H. Ahlen, M. González-Herráez","doi":"10.1117/12.2263357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents the first report on on-line and final blind field test results of a pipeline integrity threat surveillance system. The system integrates a machine+activity identification mode, and a threat detection mode. Two different pipeline sections were selected for the blind tests: One close to the sensor position, and the other 35 km away from it. Results of the machine+activity identification mode showed that about 46% of the times the machine, the activity or both were correctly identified. For the threat detection mode, 8 out of 10 threats were correctly detected, with 1 false alarm.","PeriodicalId":198716,"journal":{"name":"2017 25th Optical Fiber Sensors Conference (OFS)","volume":"88 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 25th Optical Fiber Sensors Conference (OFS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2263357","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Abstract
This paper presents the first report on on-line and final blind field test results of a pipeline integrity threat surveillance system. The system integrates a machine+activity identification mode, and a threat detection mode. Two different pipeline sections were selected for the blind tests: One close to the sensor position, and the other 35 km away from it. Results of the machine+activity identification mode showed that about 46% of the times the machine, the activity or both were correctly identified. For the threat detection mode, 8 out of 10 threats were correctly detected, with 1 false alarm.