Be Poetics of Plenitude and the Poet’s Biography: Self-Creation in Some Later Poems by John Ashbery

Kacper Bartczak
{"title":"Be Poetics of Plenitude and the Poet’s Biography: Self-Creation in Some Later Poems by John Ashbery","authors":"Kacper Bartczak","doi":"10.7311/pjas.9/2015/4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Thee article deals with the status of biographical references in John Ashbery’s later poetry. It is an attempt to work out an approach that, while keeping the biographical in view, is an alternative to the way in which the biographical has functioned in recent Ashbery scholarship. In discussing Ashbery’s strategy, I use the neo-pragmatist idea of aesthetic self-creation, especially a version of it developed by Alexander Nehamas in his writings on aesthetic objects. The term I am developing to discuss the variety of self-creation in Ashbery is “the emerging self,” and I see it as a component of a poetics which I am calling the pragmatist ironist poetics of plenitude. The emerging self of the poetics of plenitude, rising over the expanse of a lifetime of poetry writing, is a type of poetic authorial subjectivity whose relation to the empirical facts of the author’s biography reverses the relation between poetry and biography found in confessional poetry. The poetics of plenitude shows the biographical fact to be dependent on the poetic element on which it relies for its authenticity. Within the poetics of plenitude, it is the poetic that is the real and authentic.","PeriodicalId":384144,"journal":{"name":"Polish Journal for American Studies","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Journal for American Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7311/pjas.9/2015/4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Thee article deals with the status of biographical references in John Ashbery’s later poetry. It is an attempt to work out an approach that, while keeping the biographical in view, is an alternative to the way in which the biographical has functioned in recent Ashbery scholarship. In discussing Ashbery’s strategy, I use the neo-pragmatist idea of aesthetic self-creation, especially a version of it developed by Alexander Nehamas in his writings on aesthetic objects. The term I am developing to discuss the variety of self-creation in Ashbery is “the emerging self,” and I see it as a component of a poetics which I am calling the pragmatist ironist poetics of plenitude. The emerging self of the poetics of plenitude, rising over the expanse of a lifetime of poetry writing, is a type of poetic authorial subjectivity whose relation to the empirical facts of the author’s biography reverses the relation between poetry and biography found in confessional poetry. The poetics of plenitude shows the biographical fact to be dependent on the poetic element on which it relies for its authenticity. Within the poetics of plenitude, it is the poetic that is the real and authentic.
《充实的诗学与诗人传记:约翰·阿什伯里后期诗歌中的自我创造》
本文论述了传记参考在约翰·阿什伯里后期诗歌中的地位。它试图找到一种方法,在保持传记的视角的同时,是一种替代传记在最近阿什伯里学术研究中发挥作用的方式。在讨论Ashbery的策略时,我使用了审美自我创造的新实用主义观点,特别是Alexander Nehamas在他关于审美对象的著作中提出的一个版本。在阿什伯里,我用来讨论各种自我创造的术语是"浮现的自我"我把它看作是诗学的一个组成部分我称之为实用主义的讽刺主义的丰富诗学。丰饶诗学的涌现自我,在其一生的诗歌创作中冉冉升起,是一种诗歌作者的主体性,它与作者传记的经验事实的关系,逆转了自白诗中诗歌与传记的关系。丰富的诗学表明,传记事实依赖于诗歌元素,而诗歌元素是传记真实性的基础。在丰富的诗学中,诗歌才是真实的和真实的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信