The Influence of Scientific Approach with the Socratic Method on Learning Outcomes and Students' Mathematical Critical Thinking Dispositions

Anisah, Kurnia Rahmi Yuberta, I. M. Maris
{"title":"The Influence of Scientific Approach with the Socratic Method on Learning Outcomes and Students' Mathematical Critical Thinking Dispositions","authors":"Anisah, Kurnia Rahmi Yuberta, I. M. Maris","doi":"10.24036/rmj.v1i1.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research is based on the low learning outcomes and critical thinking disposition of students at MTsN 7 Tanah Datar. The purpose of this study was to determine the differences in the acquisition of students' mathematics learning outcomes after using the scientific approach with the Socrates method with the acquisition of students' mathematics learning outcomes with conventional learning, to find out how students' mathematical critical thinking dispositions after using the scientific approach with the Socratic method. This type of research is quasi-experimental research. The instruments used were tests of students' mathematics learning outcomes, observation sheets, and questionnaires. Based on the results of data analysis, the acquisition of students 'mathematics learning outcomes after using the scientific approach with the Socrates method is better than the acquisition of students' mathematics learning outcomes using conventional learning. Meanwhile, students' mathematical critical thinking disposition in mathematics learning using a scientific approach with the Socrates method is classified as a successful category.","PeriodicalId":352151,"journal":{"name":"Rangkiang Mathematics Journal","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rangkiang Mathematics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24036/rmj.v1i1.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research is based on the low learning outcomes and critical thinking disposition of students at MTsN 7 Tanah Datar. The purpose of this study was to determine the differences in the acquisition of students' mathematics learning outcomes after using the scientific approach with the Socrates method with the acquisition of students' mathematics learning outcomes with conventional learning, to find out how students' mathematical critical thinking dispositions after using the scientific approach with the Socratic method. This type of research is quasi-experimental research. The instruments used were tests of students' mathematics learning outcomes, observation sheets, and questionnaires. Based on the results of data analysis, the acquisition of students 'mathematics learning outcomes after using the scientific approach with the Socrates method is better than the acquisition of students' mathematics learning outcomes using conventional learning. Meanwhile, students' mathematical critical thinking disposition in mathematics learning using a scientific approach with the Socrates method is classified as a successful category.
苏格拉底方法的科学方法对学习成果和学生数学批判性思维倾向的影响
本研究是基于中学七年级学生的低学习成果和批判性思维倾向。本研究的目的是确定采用苏格拉底方法的科学方法对学生数学学习成果的习得与采用传统学习方法对学生数学学习成果的习得的差异,了解采用苏格拉底方法的科学方法对学生数学批判性思维的倾向。这种类型的研究是准实验研究。使用的工具是学生数学学习成果测试、观察表和问卷调查。根据数据分析的结果,采用苏格拉底方法的科学方法对学生数学学习成果的习得优于采用常规学习方法对学生数学学习成果的习得。同时,在苏格拉底方法的科学数学学习中,学生的数学批判性思维倾向被归类为成功的一类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信