The Normative Order of the Internet

M. Kettemann
{"title":"The Normative Order of the Internet","authors":"M. Kettemann","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780198865995.003.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chapter 6 presents in detail the normative order of the internet based on the notion of a necessary identification of, and turn toward, a nomos of the internet, which is embedded in, and configures, the normative order of the internet. The study shows that this order has many facets, contains national, international, public, and private norms, but has importantly developed its own normative logic, instruments and rules on the relation of actors and its own conception of the legitimacy of norms. The normative order provides a normative infrastructure in which the internet’s nomos, including its means of normative production and justification, are anchored. The study will determine norms belonging to the normative order of the internet to be those that have a material (non-trivial) and a normative (not merely factual) connection to the internet as a network of networks. These norms will be shown to be formally and materially legitimated. Formal legitimation will be shown to be achievable through symbolic validation through norm emergence in processes involving multiple actors. Material legitimation is possible through norms being determinate enough for their purpose (thus allowing for non-binding instruments), coherent with the core principles of the normative order of the internet, consonant with the order’s values as expressed in its principles, and adhering systematically to the normative order as a whole.","PeriodicalId":284414,"journal":{"name":"The Normative Order of the Internet","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Normative Order of the Internet","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780198865995.003.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Chapter 6 presents in detail the normative order of the internet based on the notion of a necessary identification of, and turn toward, a nomos of the internet, which is embedded in, and configures, the normative order of the internet. The study shows that this order has many facets, contains national, international, public, and private norms, but has importantly developed its own normative logic, instruments and rules on the relation of actors and its own conception of the legitimacy of norms. The normative order provides a normative infrastructure in which the internet’s nomos, including its means of normative production and justification, are anchored. The study will determine norms belonging to the normative order of the internet to be those that have a material (non-trivial) and a normative (not merely factual) connection to the internet as a network of networks. These norms will be shown to be formally and materially legitimated. Formal legitimation will be shown to be achievable through symbolic validation through norm emergence in processes involving multiple actors. Material legitimation is possible through norms being determinate enough for their purpose (thus allowing for non-binding instruments), coherent with the core principles of the normative order of the internet, consonant with the order’s values as expressed in its principles, and adhering systematically to the normative order as a whole.
互联网的规范秩序
第6章详细介绍了互联网的规范秩序,这一概念基于对互联网规范秩序的必要识别,并转向互联网的nomos, nomos嵌入并配置了互联网的规范秩序。研究表明,这一秩序有许多方面,包括国家、国际、公共和私人规范,但重要的是,它发展了自己的规范逻辑、工具和关于行动者关系的规则,以及自己对规范合法性的概念。规范秩序提供了一个规范的基础设施,在这个基础设施中,互联网的nomos,包括其规范生产和正当化的手段,都是锚定的。该研究将确定属于互联网规范秩序的规范是那些与作为网络的网络的互联网具有物质(非琐碎)和规范(不仅仅是事实)联系的规范。这些规范将被证明在形式上和物质上是合法的。正式合法化将被证明是可以通过涉及多个参与者的过程中的规范出现的象征性验证来实现的。通过规范对其目的具有足够的确定性(从而允许非约束性工具),与互联网规范秩序的核心原则相一致,与其原则所表达的秩序价值一致,并系统地坚持规范秩序作为一个整体,物质合法化是可能的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信