The Effectiveness of Monetary Policy in China: Evidence from a Qual VAR

Hongyi Chen, Kenneth K. Chow, Peter Tillmann
{"title":"The Effectiveness of Monetary Policy in China: Evidence from a Qual VAR","authors":"Hongyi Chen, Kenneth K. Chow, Peter Tillmann","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2778404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Analyzing monetary policy in China is not straightforward because the People's Bank of China (PBoC) implements policy by using more than one instrument. In this paper we use a Qual VAR, a conventional VAR system augmented with binary policy announcements, to extract a latent indicator of tightening and easing pressure, respectively, for China. The model acknowledges that policy announcements are endogenous and summarizes policy by a single indicator. The Qual VAR allows us to study the impact of monetary policy in terms of unexpected changes in these latent variables, which we identify using sign restrictions. We show that the transmission of monetary policy impulses to the rest of the economy is similar to the transmission process in advanced economies in terms of both output growth and inflation despite a very different monetary policy framework. We find that bank loans are not sensitive to policy changes, which implies that window guidance is still a necessary policy tool. We also find that the impact of monetary policy shocks is asymmetric in terms of asset prices, that is, the asset price reactions differ in their sensitivity to tightening shocks and easing shocks, respectively. In particular, an easing of monetary conditions boosts stock prices while a tightening shock leaves stock prices unaffected. This shows that monetary policy is not a suitable tool to stabilize asset prices, which raises implications for financial stability and macroprudential policy.","PeriodicalId":111923,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Monetary Policy (Topic)","volume":"255 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"67","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Monetary Policy (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2778404","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 67

Abstract

Analyzing monetary policy in China is not straightforward because the People's Bank of China (PBoC) implements policy by using more than one instrument. In this paper we use a Qual VAR, a conventional VAR system augmented with binary policy announcements, to extract a latent indicator of tightening and easing pressure, respectively, for China. The model acknowledges that policy announcements are endogenous and summarizes policy by a single indicator. The Qual VAR allows us to study the impact of monetary policy in terms of unexpected changes in these latent variables, which we identify using sign restrictions. We show that the transmission of monetary policy impulses to the rest of the economy is similar to the transmission process in advanced economies in terms of both output growth and inflation despite a very different monetary policy framework. We find that bank loans are not sensitive to policy changes, which implies that window guidance is still a necessary policy tool. We also find that the impact of monetary policy shocks is asymmetric in terms of asset prices, that is, the asset price reactions differ in their sensitivity to tightening shocks and easing shocks, respectively. In particular, an easing of monetary conditions boosts stock prices while a tightening shock leaves stock prices unaffected. This shows that monetary policy is not a suitable tool to stabilize asset prices, which raises implications for financial stability and macroprudential policy.
中国货币政策有效性:来自等值VAR的证据
分析中国的货币政策并不简单,因为中国人民银行(PBoC)通过使用多种工具来实施政策。在本文中,我们使用一个带有二元政策公告的传统VAR系统Qual VAR来分别提取中国的紧缩和宽松压力的潜在指标。该模型承认政策公告是内生的,并通过单一指标对政策进行总结。Qual VAR允许我们根据这些潜在变量的意外变化来研究货币政策的影响,我们使用符号限制来识别这些潜在变量。我们表明,尽管货币政策框架非常不同,但就产出增长和通胀而言,货币政策冲动向其他经济部门的传导过程与发达经济体的传导过程相似。我们发现银行贷款对政策变化不敏感,这意味着窗口指导仍然是必要的政策工具。我们还发现,货币政策冲击对资产价格的影响是不对称的,即资产价格反应对紧缩冲击和宽松冲击的敏感性不同。特别是,宽松的货币环境会推动股价上涨,而紧缩的冲击则不会影响股价。这表明货币政策不是稳定资产价格的合适工具,这对金融稳定和宏观审慎政策产生了影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信