The mHealth Power Paradox: Improving Data Protection in Health Apps through Self-Regulation in the European Union

Hannah van Kolfschooten
{"title":"The mHealth Power Paradox: Improving Data Protection in Health Apps through Self-Regulation in the European Union","authors":"Hannah van Kolfschooten","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3871033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An increasing number of EU citizens uses self-monitoring mHealth apps: apps used by consumers in a private setting to monitor their general health. The extensive processing of health data by these apps poses severe risks to users’ privacy. These risks are exacerbated by the inapplicability of the EU legal framework on health and patients’ rights to these apps. Furthermore, while the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation provides a solid legal framework for the protection of health data, in practice, many mHealth apps do not comply. In light of the lack of effective EU regulation, this paper examines the feasibility of self-regulation by app stores as a complementary form of regulation in order to improve the level of protection of EU mHealth app users. App stores already play an important role by regulating third-party mHealth apps distributed on their platforms in a top-down manner by means of app review procedures. In order to assess the effectiveness of these existing practices, a case study analysis is performed on the regulatory practices of Apple’s App Store and Google’s Google Play Store. This analysis is the basis for recommendations on how to strengthen current self-regulation initiatives by app stores in the context of health data protection.","PeriodicalId":139603,"journal":{"name":"Libraries & Information Technology eJournal","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Libraries & Information Technology eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3871033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

An increasing number of EU citizens uses self-monitoring mHealth apps: apps used by consumers in a private setting to monitor their general health. The extensive processing of health data by these apps poses severe risks to users’ privacy. These risks are exacerbated by the inapplicability of the EU legal framework on health and patients’ rights to these apps. Furthermore, while the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation provides a solid legal framework for the protection of health data, in practice, many mHealth apps do not comply. In light of the lack of effective EU regulation, this paper examines the feasibility of self-regulation by app stores as a complementary form of regulation in order to improve the level of protection of EU mHealth app users. App stores already play an important role by regulating third-party mHealth apps distributed on their platforms in a top-down manner by means of app review procedures. In order to assess the effectiveness of these existing practices, a case study analysis is performed on the regulatory practices of Apple’s App Store and Google’s Google Play Store. This analysis is the basis for recommendations on how to strengthen current self-regulation initiatives by app stores in the context of health data protection.
移动医疗权力悖论:通过欧盟的自我监管改善健康应用程序的数据保护
越来越多的欧盟公民使用自我监测移动健康应用程序:消费者在私人环境中使用的应用程序,用于监测他们的一般健康状况。这些应用程序对健康数据的大量处理给用户的隐私带来了严重的风险。欧盟关于这些应用程序的健康和患者权利的法律框架不适用,加剧了这些风险。此外,虽然欧盟的《通用数据保护条例》为保护健康数据提供了坚实的法律框架,但在实践中,许多移动健康应用程序并不遵守。鉴于欧盟缺乏有效的监管,本文探讨了应用商店自我监管作为一种补充监管形式的可行性,以提高欧盟移动健康应用程序用户的保护水平。应用程序商店已经发挥了重要作用,通过应用程序审查程序,以自上而下的方式规范在其平台上分发的第三方移动医疗应用程序。为了评估这些现有做法的有效性,本文对苹果App Store和谷歌Google Play Store的监管做法进行了案例研究分析。这一分析是关于如何在健康数据保护的背景下加强应用商店当前自我监管举措的建议的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信