Intangible Assets and Capital Structure

Steve C. Lim, Antonio J. Macias, T. Moeller
{"title":"Intangible Assets and Capital Structure","authors":"Steve C. Lim, Antonio J. Macias, T. Moeller","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2514551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With intangible assets representing at least one third of U.S. corporate assets and one half of annual investment, it is important to understand to what extent intangible assets support debt. Some characteristics of intangible assets, such as high valuation risk and poor collateralizability, can discourage debt financing. Yet, intangible assets can generate cash flows just as reliably as tangible assets and may therefore support debt like tangible assets do. The empirical capital structure research has struggled to quantify the effects of intangible assets on leverage because most intangible assets are not reflected in financial statements. We take advantage of a recent accounting rule change that has made it possible to observe market-based valuations of a large part of intangible assets that beforehand where largely unobservable. With this novel dataset, we find a strong positive relation between intangible assets and financial leverage. The strength of this relation depends on the type of firm. In firms with ample tangible assets, the tangible assets can support the desired debt and intangible assets do not affect leverage. In firms with limited tangible assets, intangible assets strongly affect leverage and are the primary support of debt. On a per dollar basis across all firms, intangible assets support roughly three quarters as much debt financing as tangible assets. We also observe that the type of debt financing differs for firms whose assets are predominantly intangible. Firms with higher proportions of intangible assets utilize more unsecured and convertible debt, debt types that fit an intangible asset base well.","PeriodicalId":284967,"journal":{"name":"Merger and Acquisition","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"85","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Merger and Acquisition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2514551","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 85

Abstract

With intangible assets representing at least one third of U.S. corporate assets and one half of annual investment, it is important to understand to what extent intangible assets support debt. Some characteristics of intangible assets, such as high valuation risk and poor collateralizability, can discourage debt financing. Yet, intangible assets can generate cash flows just as reliably as tangible assets and may therefore support debt like tangible assets do. The empirical capital structure research has struggled to quantify the effects of intangible assets on leverage because most intangible assets are not reflected in financial statements. We take advantage of a recent accounting rule change that has made it possible to observe market-based valuations of a large part of intangible assets that beforehand where largely unobservable. With this novel dataset, we find a strong positive relation between intangible assets and financial leverage. The strength of this relation depends on the type of firm. In firms with ample tangible assets, the tangible assets can support the desired debt and intangible assets do not affect leverage. In firms with limited tangible assets, intangible assets strongly affect leverage and are the primary support of debt. On a per dollar basis across all firms, intangible assets support roughly three quarters as much debt financing as tangible assets. We also observe that the type of debt financing differs for firms whose assets are predominantly intangible. Firms with higher proportions of intangible assets utilize more unsecured and convertible debt, debt types that fit an intangible asset base well.
无形资产和资本结构
由于无形资产至少占美国公司资产的三分之一和年度投资的一半,了解无形资产在多大程度上支持债务是很重要的。无形资产的一些特点,如高估值风险和较差的可担保性,会阻碍债务融资。然而,无形资产可以像有形资产一样可靠地产生现金流,因此可能会像有形资产一样支持债务。实证资本结构研究一直在努力量化无形资产对杠杆的影响,因为大多数无形资产没有反映在财务报表中。我们利用了最近一项会计规则的变化,该变化使我们能够观察到大部分无形资产的基于市场的估值,而这些无形资产在之前基本上是不可观察的。利用这个新颖的数据集,我们发现无形资产与财务杠杆之间存在很强的正相关关系。这种关系的强度取决于公司的类型。在有形资产充足的企业中,有形资产可以支持期望的债务,无形资产不影响杠杆率。在有形资产有限的企业中,无形资产对杠杆的影响很大,是债务的主要支撑。在所有公司的每美元基础上,无形资产支持的债务融资大约是有形资产的四分之三。我们还观察到,对于以无形资产为主的公司,债务融资的类型有所不同。拥有较高比例无形资产的公司利用更多的无担保和可转换债务,这些债务类型非常适合无形资产基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信