‘Sophia’ and ‘Epistēmē’ in the Archaic and Classical Periods

D. Wolfsdorf
{"title":"‘Sophia’ and ‘Epistēmē’ in the Archaic and Classical Periods","authors":"D. Wolfsdorf","doi":"10.5040/9781474258302.ch-001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In philosophical contexts the originally Ionic noun 'sophiē', later Attic 'sophia' are standardly translated as 'wisdom', the adjective 'sophos' as 'wise'. But this will not do for the earliest, pre-philosophical use (cp. Snell 1924: 1-20, Gauthier and Jolif 1959: 479-89, Gladigow 1965, Meier 1970). In eighth and seventh century poetry 'sophiē' means 'skill', 'sophos' 'skilled' or 'skillful'. As we will see, wisdom is skill; but in the early poets the skills denoted by these terms are not forms of wisdom. Formal semanticists have noted that 'skill', 'skillful', and 'skilled' are semantically incomplete terms in the sense that a person who has skill or is skillful isn't skillful simpliciter, but in a particular domain. Compare 'citizen', which is semantically incomplete in a distinct, but related way: one is not a citizen simpliciter, but of a particular political body. There are various theories of such semantic incompleteness. In the case of 'skillful' one view is that in its so-called logical, as opposed to surface grammatical, form the predicate contains a domain variable whose value is supplied by context (be it linguistic or extra-linguistic). So the logical form of 'x is skillful' may be represented as:","PeriodicalId":383464,"journal":{"name":"Knowledge in Ancient Philosophy","volume":"267 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knowledge in Ancient Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474258302.ch-001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

In philosophical contexts the originally Ionic noun 'sophiē', later Attic 'sophia' are standardly translated as 'wisdom', the adjective 'sophos' as 'wise'. But this will not do for the earliest, pre-philosophical use (cp. Snell 1924: 1-20, Gauthier and Jolif 1959: 479-89, Gladigow 1965, Meier 1970). In eighth and seventh century poetry 'sophiē' means 'skill', 'sophos' 'skilled' or 'skillful'. As we will see, wisdom is skill; but in the early poets the skills denoted by these terms are not forms of wisdom. Formal semanticists have noted that 'skill', 'skillful', and 'skilled' are semantically incomplete terms in the sense that a person who has skill or is skillful isn't skillful simpliciter, but in a particular domain. Compare 'citizen', which is semantically incomplete in a distinct, but related way: one is not a citizen simpliciter, but of a particular political body. There are various theories of such semantic incompleteness. In the case of 'skillful' one view is that in its so-called logical, as opposed to surface grammatical, form the predicate contains a domain variable whose value is supplied by context (be it linguistic or extra-linguistic). So the logical form of 'x is skillful' may be represented as:
古代和古典时期的“索菲亚”和“Epistēmē”
在哲学语境中,最初的爱奥尼亚名词“索菲亚”,后来的阿提卡“索菲亚”被标准地翻译为“智慧”,形容词“sophos”被翻译为“明智”。但这并不适用于最早的、前哲学的使用(cp. Snell 1924: 1-20, Gauthier and Jolif 1959: 479-89, Gladigow 1965, Meier 1970)。在8世纪和7世纪的诗歌中,“索菲亚”意为“技巧”,“sophos”意为“熟练的”或“熟练的”。我们将会看到,智慧就是技巧;但在早期诗人中,这些术语所代表的技能并不是智慧的形式。形式语义学家已经注意到,“skill”、“skilled”和“skilled”是语义上不完整的术语,也就是说,一个拥有技能或熟练的人并不是熟练的,而是在一个特定的领域。比较一下“citizen”,它在语义上是不完整的,以一种独特但相关的方式:一个人不是一个简单的公民,而是一个特定的政治团体。关于这种语义不完全性有各种各样的理论。就"熟练的"而言,一种观点认为,在其所谓的逻辑形式中,与表面语法形式相反,谓词包含一个领域变量,其值由上下文(无论是语言的还是非语言的)提供。因此,'x is skillful'的逻辑形式可以表示为:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书