Web proxy cache replacement: do's, don'ts, and expectations

P. Triantafillou, Ioannis Aekaterinidis
{"title":"Web proxy cache replacement: do's, don'ts, and expectations","authors":"P. Triantafillou, Ioannis Aekaterinidis","doi":"10.1109/NCA.2003.1201138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Numerous research efforts have produced a large number of algorithms and mechanisms for web proxy caches. In order to build powerful web proxies and understand their performance, one must be able to appreciate the impact and significance of earlier contributions and how they can be integrated To do this we employ a cache replacement algorithm, 'CSP, which integrates key knowledge from previous work. CSP utilizes the communication Cost to fetch web objects, the objects' Sizes, their Popularifies, an auxiliary cache and a cache admission control algorithm. We study the impact of these components with respect to hit ratio, latency, and bandwidth requirements. Our results show that there are clear performance gains when utilizing the communication cost, the popularity of objects, and the auxiliary cache. In contrast, the size of objects and the admission controller have a negligible performance impact. Our major conclusions going against those in related work are that (i) LRU is preferable to CSP for important parameter values, (ii) accounting for the objects' sizes does not improve latency and/or bandwidth requirements, and (iii) the collaboration of nearby proxies is not very beneficial. Based on these results, we chart the problem solution space, identifying which algorithm is preferable and under which conditions. Finally, we develop a dynamic replacement algorithm that continuously utilizes the best algorithm as the problem-parameter values (e.g., the access distributions) change with time.","PeriodicalId":203990,"journal":{"name":"Second IEEE International Symposium on Network Computing and Applications, 2003. NCA 2003.","volume":"409 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Second IEEE International Symposium on Network Computing and Applications, 2003. NCA 2003.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NCA.2003.1201138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Numerous research efforts have produced a large number of algorithms and mechanisms for web proxy caches. In order to build powerful web proxies and understand their performance, one must be able to appreciate the impact and significance of earlier contributions and how they can be integrated To do this we employ a cache replacement algorithm, 'CSP, which integrates key knowledge from previous work. CSP utilizes the communication Cost to fetch web objects, the objects' Sizes, their Popularifies, an auxiliary cache and a cache admission control algorithm. We study the impact of these components with respect to hit ratio, latency, and bandwidth requirements. Our results show that there are clear performance gains when utilizing the communication cost, the popularity of objects, and the auxiliary cache. In contrast, the size of objects and the admission controller have a negligible performance impact. Our major conclusions going against those in related work are that (i) LRU is preferable to CSP for important parameter values, (ii) accounting for the objects' sizes does not improve latency and/or bandwidth requirements, and (iii) the collaboration of nearby proxies is not very beneficial. Based on these results, we chart the problem solution space, identifying which algorithm is preferable and under which conditions. Finally, we develop a dynamic replacement algorithm that continuously utilizes the best algorithm as the problem-parameter values (e.g., the access distributions) change with time.
Web代理缓存替换:该做、不该做和期望
大量的研究工作已经产生了大量的web代理缓存算法和机制。为了构建强大的web代理并理解它们的性能,人们必须能够理解早期贡献的影响和重要性,以及如何集成它们。为此,我们采用了缓存替换算法CSP,该算法集成了以前工作中的关键知识。CSP利用通信开销来获取web对象、对象的大小、对象的普及程度、辅助缓存和缓存准入控制算法。我们研究了这些组件在命中率、延迟和带宽需求方面的影响。我们的结果表明,当利用通信成本、对象的流行程度和辅助缓存时,有明显的性能增益。相比之下,对象的大小和接纳控制器对性能的影响可以忽略不计。与相关工作相反,我们的主要结论是(i) LRU在重要参数值上优于CSP, (ii)考虑对象的大小并不能改善延迟和/或带宽需求,(iii)附近代理的协作不是很有益。基于这些结果,我们绘制了问题的解空间图,确定了哪种算法在哪些条件下是优选的。最后,我们开发了一种动态替换算法,当问题参数值(例如访问分布)随时间变化时,该算法持续使用最佳算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信