The Impact of Communication Models on Routing-Algorithm Convergence

A. D. Jaggard, V. Ramachandran, R. Wright
{"title":"The Impact of Communication Models on Routing-Algorithm Convergence","authors":"A. D. Jaggard, V. Ramachandran, R. Wright","doi":"10.1109/ICDCS.2009.61","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Autonomous routing algorithms, such as BGP, are intended to reach a globally consistent set of routes after nodes iteratively and independently collect, process, and share network information. Generally, the important role of the mechanism used to share information has been overlooked in previous analyses of these algorithms. In this paper, we explicitly study how the network-communication model affects algorithm convergence. To do this, we consider a variety of factors, including channel reliability, how much information is processed from channels, and how many channels are processed simultaneously. Using these factors, we define a taxonomy of communication models and identify particular models of interest, including those used in previous theoretical work, those that most closely model real-world implementations of BGP, and those of potential interest for the design of future routing algorithms. We characterize an extensive set of relationships among models in our taxonomy and show that convergence depends on the communication model in nontrivial ways. These results highlight that certain models are best for proving conditions that guarantee convergence, while other models are best for characterizing conditions that might permit nonconvergence.","PeriodicalId":387968,"journal":{"name":"2009 29th IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 29th IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDCS.2009.61","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Autonomous routing algorithms, such as BGP, are intended to reach a globally consistent set of routes after nodes iteratively and independently collect, process, and share network information. Generally, the important role of the mechanism used to share information has been overlooked in previous analyses of these algorithms. In this paper, we explicitly study how the network-communication model affects algorithm convergence. To do this, we consider a variety of factors, including channel reliability, how much information is processed from channels, and how many channels are processed simultaneously. Using these factors, we define a taxonomy of communication models and identify particular models of interest, including those used in previous theoretical work, those that most closely model real-world implementations of BGP, and those of potential interest for the design of future routing algorithms. We characterize an extensive set of relationships among models in our taxonomy and show that convergence depends on the communication model in nontrivial ways. These results highlight that certain models are best for proving conditions that guarantee convergence, while other models are best for characterizing conditions that might permit nonconvergence.
通信模型对路由算法收敛的影响
自治路由算法(如BGP)是指各节点对网络信息进行迭代、独立的收集、处理和共享,从而得到全局一致的路由集。通常,在之前对这些算法的分析中,用于共享信息的机制的重要作用被忽视了。本文明确地研究了网络通信模型对算法收敛性的影响。为此,我们考虑了多种因素,包括信道可靠性、从信道中处理了多少信息以及同时处理了多少信道。利用这些因素,我们定义了通信模型的分类,并确定了感兴趣的特定模型,包括那些在以前的理论工作中使用的模型,那些最接近模拟BGP实际实现的模型,以及那些对未来路由算法设计潜在感兴趣的模型。我们描述了分类法中模型之间广泛的关系集,并表明收敛以非平凡的方式依赖于通信模型。这些结果强调,某些模型最适合证明保证收敛的条件,而其他模型最适合描述可能允许不收敛的条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信