Quantitative Easing: New Normal or Emergency Measure?

P. Bartkiewicz
{"title":"Quantitative Easing: New Normal or Emergency Measure?","authors":"P. Bartkiewicz","doi":"10.5709/ce.1897-9254.406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores the economic justification of the use of unconventional monetary policy instruments such as asset purchase programmes (known as quantitative easing, QE) with the aim of assessing the nature of QE in the context of future monetary policy in Poland. Since 2008, numerous asset purchase programmes have been launched by central banks in major developed economies to raise economic growth and inflation in the aftermath of the Global Financial Crisis. These programmes can be seen either as part of broader, longer trends (demographic, socioeconomic) or as an emergency measure (i.e. a response to unique circumstances). The former hypothesis calls on central banks to treat unconventional monetary policy instruments as a necessary part of their toolbox, while the latter implies that QE is unlikely to be used again in the future. Drawing from a wide set of macroeconomic data and a proprietary literature review, I describe the macroeconomic context for unconventional monetary policy, present arguments for both paradigms and their implications. I conclude that recent developments favor the former hypothesis and that this debate will most likely be settled within several years and can be informed by business cycle developments in major developed economies.","PeriodicalId":145273,"journal":{"name":"Monetary Economics: Central Banks - Policies & Impacts eJournal","volume":"183 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monetary Economics: Central Banks - Policies & Impacts eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5709/ce.1897-9254.406","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This article explores the economic justification of the use of unconventional monetary policy instruments such as asset purchase programmes (known as quantitative easing, QE) with the aim of assessing the nature of QE in the context of future monetary policy in Poland. Since 2008, numerous asset purchase programmes have been launched by central banks in major developed economies to raise economic growth and inflation in the aftermath of the Global Financial Crisis. These programmes can be seen either as part of broader, longer trends (demographic, socioeconomic) or as an emergency measure (i.e. a response to unique circumstances). The former hypothesis calls on central banks to treat unconventional monetary policy instruments as a necessary part of their toolbox, while the latter implies that QE is unlikely to be used again in the future. Drawing from a wide set of macroeconomic data and a proprietary literature review, I describe the macroeconomic context for unconventional monetary policy, present arguments for both paradigms and their implications. I conclude that recent developments favor the former hypothesis and that this debate will most likely be settled within several years and can be informed by business cycle developments in major developed economies.
量化宽松:新常态还是应急措施?
本文探讨了使用非常规货币政策工具的经济理由,如资产购买计划(称为量化宽松,QE),目的是在波兰未来货币政策的背景下评估量化宽松的性质。自2008年以来,主要发达经济体的央行推出了许多资产购买计划,以在全球金融危机之后提高经济增长和通胀。这些方案既可以视为更广泛、更长期趋势(人口、社会经济)的一部分,也可以视为紧急措施(即对特殊情况的反应)。前一种假设要求各国央行将非常规货币政策工具视为其工具箱的必要组成部分,而后一种假设则暗示,未来不太可能再次使用量化宽松。从广泛的宏观经济数据和专有文献综述中,我描述了非常规货币政策的宏观经济背景,提出了两种范式及其含义的论点。我的结论是,最近的发展倾向于前一种假设,这场辩论很可能在几年内得到解决,并可以从主要发达经济体的商业周期发展中得到启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信