{"title":"ANALISIS KRITIKAN JASSER AUDA TERHADAP KAEDAH AL-NASKH","authors":"Izal Mustafa Kamar","doi":"10.56389/tafhim.vol14no1.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are various efforts by modern researchers and scholars which are aimed at introducing some kind of reformation (tajdīd) to various aspects related to uṣūl al-fiqh and maqāṣid. One of those leading contemporary reformation proponents in uṣūl al-fiqh today is Jasser Auda. This paper aims to analyse one of his proposals, which is related to the concept of al-naskh (abrogation). According to him, the principle of abrogation does not have any religious basis in the al-Qur’ān nor the Sunnah. It is instead in most situations a personal opinion of the narrator/comentator. As an alternative to alnaskh, his proposal is for the uṣūliyyūn to consider the maqāṣid (higher objectives) behind each verse (naṣṣ) in circumstances where there are disagreements between the verses (nuṣūṣ).","PeriodicalId":430568,"journal":{"name":"TAFHIM: IKIM Journal of Islam and the Contemporary World","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TAFHIM: IKIM Journal of Islam and the Contemporary World","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56389/tafhim.vol14no1.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
There are various efforts by modern researchers and scholars which are aimed at introducing some kind of reformation (tajdīd) to various aspects related to uṣūl al-fiqh and maqāṣid. One of those leading contemporary reformation proponents in uṣūl al-fiqh today is Jasser Auda. This paper aims to analyse one of his proposals, which is related to the concept of al-naskh (abrogation). According to him, the principle of abrogation does not have any religious basis in the al-Qur’ān nor the Sunnah. It is instead in most situations a personal opinion of the narrator/comentator. As an alternative to alnaskh, his proposal is for the uṣūliyyūn to consider the maqāṣid (higher objectives) behind each verse (naṣṣ) in circumstances where there are disagreements between the verses (nuṣūṣ).