The order and the Volk. Romantic roots and enduring fascination of the German constitutional history

Emanuele Conte
{"title":"The order and the Volk. Romantic roots and enduring fascination of the German constitutional history","authors":"Emanuele Conte","doi":"10.14220/9783737007313.37","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For the German legal historians of the 19 th Century, Germany existed as a nation well before the establishment of a unitarian State. Based of shared values and a common spirit, this nation was described as having a constitution (German Verfassung) not enacted by any constitutional power but based on the concrete order of the German communities. After 1920, German social historians took up the torch of this vision of institutional history from the hands of legal historians. Being the most important representative of the German constitutional historiography during the Nazi time, Otto Brunner published a series of essays that largely spread this identitarian view of national laws also outside the borders of Germany. They presented the medieval law as an immanent “order” rather than as a set of State norms. Despite being clearly driven by political and cultural debates of the 19 th-20 th Century Germany, the key concepts of this historiographical stream (called Vefassungsgeschichte) are still used by French and Italian legal historical research. CONTENT. 1. History and Law after the First World War – 2. Verfassung and History – 3. Verfassungsgeschichte as the history of an “order” – 4. Otto Brunner: From German Law to Verfassung and Society – 5. Some examples of the enduring persistence of the idea of a medieval ordo in European historiography – 6. Conclusions * Full Professor in History of Medioeval and Modern Law, Faculty of Law, Roma Tre University. ** This text is a revised version of a talk to the Law Faculty held at Chicago University in April 2016, and appeared in a slightly different version in De rebus divinis et humanis Essays in honour of Jan Hallebeek, ed. Harry Dondorp / Martin Schermaier / Boudewijn Sirks, Göttingen 2019, pp. 37-53. I wish to thank William Sullivan for his substantial help in improving my English. ARTICLES","PeriodicalId":166086,"journal":{"name":"De rebus divinis et humanis","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"De rebus divinis et humanis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14220/9783737007313.37","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For the German legal historians of the 19 th Century, Germany existed as a nation well before the establishment of a unitarian State. Based of shared values and a common spirit, this nation was described as having a constitution (German Verfassung) not enacted by any constitutional power but based on the concrete order of the German communities. After 1920, German social historians took up the torch of this vision of institutional history from the hands of legal historians. Being the most important representative of the German constitutional historiography during the Nazi time, Otto Brunner published a series of essays that largely spread this identitarian view of national laws also outside the borders of Germany. They presented the medieval law as an immanent “order” rather than as a set of State norms. Despite being clearly driven by political and cultural debates of the 19 th-20 th Century Germany, the key concepts of this historiographical stream (called Vefassungsgeschichte) are still used by French and Italian legal historical research. CONTENT. 1. History and Law after the First World War – 2. Verfassung and History – 3. Verfassungsgeschichte as the history of an “order” – 4. Otto Brunner: From German Law to Verfassung and Society – 5. Some examples of the enduring persistence of the idea of a medieval ordo in European historiography – 6. Conclusions * Full Professor in History of Medioeval and Modern Law, Faculty of Law, Roma Tre University. ** This text is a revised version of a talk to the Law Faculty held at Chicago University in April 2016, and appeared in a slightly different version in De rebus divinis et humanis Essays in honour of Jan Hallebeek, ed. Harry Dondorp / Martin Schermaier / Boudewijn Sirks, Göttingen 2019, pp. 37-53. I wish to thank William Sullivan for his substantial help in improving my English. ARTICLES
秩序和人民。德国宪政史的浪漫根源与持久魅力
对于19世纪的德国法律史学家来说,德国作为一个民族早在一神论国家建立之前就存在了。基于共同的价值观和共同的精神,这个国家被描述为拥有一部宪法(德语Verfassung),它不是由任何宪法权力制定的,而是基于德国社区的具体秩序。1920年以后,德国社会历史学家从法律历史学家手中接过了这一制度历史观的火炬。作为纳粹时期德国宪法史学最重要的代表人物,奥托·布伦纳发表了一系列文章,在很大程度上将这种对国家法律的认同观点传播到德国境外。他们认为中世纪的法律是一种内在的“秩序”,而不是一套国家规范。尽管受到19 -20世纪德国政治和文化辩论的明显推动,这一史学流派的关键概念(称为Vefassungsgeschichte)仍然被法国和意大利的法律历史研究所使用。内容。1. 第二次世界大战后的历史和法律。Verfassung和历史- 3。Verfassungsgeschichte作为一个“秩序”的历史- 4。奥托·布伦纳:从德国法律到Verfassung和社会- 5。欧洲史学中关于中世纪奥尔多的观点经久不衰的一些例子。罗马第三大学法学院中世纪和现代法律史正教授。**本文是2016年4月在芝加哥大学举行的法学院演讲的修订版,并以略有不同的版本出现在《De rebus divinis et humanis Essays》中,以纪念Jan Hallebeek,编辑。Harry Dondorp / Martin Schermaier / Boudewijn Sirks, Göttingen 2019,第37-53页。我要感谢威廉·沙利文在提高我的英语水平方面给予的大力帮助。文章
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信