{"title":"Defenders of Racial Justice","authors":"B. Thomas","doi":"10.18422/73-09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The best way to explore the confluence of law and literature from ratification of the Reconstruction amendments to Plessy is to focus on the career of a little known figure, the lawyer-novelist Albion W. Tourgée, and his relationship to Samuel Phillips, a lawyer who would become the second Solicitor General of the United States. This essay traces their efforts to achieve some semblance of racial justice in the post bellum South, and how eventually these two came to defend Homer Plessy in the infamous Plessy v Ferguson case (which established the separate but equal doctrine). In examining Plessy, this essay reveals how the structure of that defense could be traced to Tourgée's fiction, and how their defense, and its echoes, which extend to Brown v Board of Education and beyond, help to prove the old adage that truth often proves to be stranger than fiction.","PeriodicalId":221210,"journal":{"name":"New American Studies Journal","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New American Studies Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18422/73-09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The best way to explore the confluence of law and literature from ratification of the Reconstruction amendments to Plessy is to focus on the career of a little known figure, the lawyer-novelist Albion W. Tourgée, and his relationship to Samuel Phillips, a lawyer who would become the second Solicitor General of the United States. This essay traces their efforts to achieve some semblance of racial justice in the post bellum South, and how eventually these two came to defend Homer Plessy in the infamous Plessy v Ferguson case (which established the separate but equal doctrine). In examining Plessy, this essay reveals how the structure of that defense could be traced to Tourgée's fiction, and how their defense, and its echoes, which extend to Brown v Board of Education and beyond, help to prove the old adage that truth often proves to be stranger than fiction.
从重建修正案的批准到普莱西案,探索法律与文学融合的最佳方式,是关注一位鲜为人知的人物——律师小说家阿尔比恩·w·图尔格海姆(Albion W. tourgsamei)的职业生涯,以及他与塞缪尔·菲利普斯(Samuel Phillips)的关系。菲利普斯后来成为美国第二任副检察长。这篇文章追溯了他们在内战后的南方为实现某种表面上的种族正义所做的努力,以及他们最终如何在臭名昭著的普莱西诉弗格森案中为荷马·普莱西辩护(该案件确立了隔离但平等的原则)。在研究普莱西案的过程中,本文揭示了这种辩护的结构如何可以追溯到图尔格萨梅的小说,以及他们的辩护及其回响,如何延伸到布朗诉教育委员会案及其他案件,有助于证明那句古老的格言:事实往往比小说更奇怪。