Fake or Fortune? Alexander Dorner and the Weimar Reproductions Debate

Camilla Balbi
{"title":"Fake or Fortune? Alexander Dorner and the Weimar Reproductions Debate","authors":"Camilla Balbi","doi":"10.30687/va/2385-2720/2021/07/006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Between 1929 and 1930 the Der Kreis journal hosted a debate among art historians and museum directors on how art copies were changing the museum landscape. The so-called Hamburger Faksimile-Streit constitutes a crucial moment in the Weimarian theoretical debate on the categories of copy and original, culminating a few years later in Benjamin’s well-known essay on the work of art. After examining the theses of the main participants in the debate, this article focus on the position of curator and museum director Alexander Dorner – the only one advocating for the non-superiority of originals over copies in art museums – and on his relationship with Walter Benjamin’s later theories.","PeriodicalId":311787,"journal":{"name":"Original/Copy","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Original/Copy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30687/va/2385-2720/2021/07/006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Between 1929 and 1930 the Der Kreis journal hosted a debate among art historians and museum directors on how art copies were changing the museum landscape. The so-called Hamburger Faksimile-Streit constitutes a crucial moment in the Weimarian theoretical debate on the categories of copy and original, culminating a few years later in Benjamin’s well-known essay on the work of art. After examining the theses of the main participants in the debate, this article focus on the position of curator and museum director Alexander Dorner – the only one advocating for the non-superiority of originals over copies in art museums – and on his relationship with Walter Benjamin’s later theories.
假的还是幸运的?亚历山大·多尔纳和魏玛复制品之争
1929年至1930年间,《Der Kreis》杂志在艺术史学家和博物馆馆长之间举办了一场辩论,讨论艺术复制品是如何改变博物馆景观的。在魏玛主义关于复制和原创范畴的理论辩论中,所谓的汉堡仿制品街(Hamburger fake - streit)构成了一个关键时刻,几年后在本雅明那篇著名的关于艺术品的文章中达到了高潮。在考察了辩论中主要参与者的论文之后,本文将重点放在策展人兼博物馆馆长亚历山大·多尔纳(Alexander Dorner)的立场上——他是唯一一个主张艺术博物馆中原作比复制品不具有优越性的人——以及他与瓦尔特·本雅明(Walter Benjamin)后来的理论的关系上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信