Emotional analysis of safeness and risk perception of London and Rome airports during the COVID-19 pandemic

F. Garzia, F. Borghini, Mattia Zita, M. Lombardi, S. Ramalingam
{"title":"Emotional analysis of safeness and risk perception of London and Rome airports during the COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"F. Garzia, F. Borghini, Mattia Zita, M. Lombardi, S. Ramalingam","doi":"10.1109/ICCST49569.2021.9717386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The evaluation of perceived safeness and risk by individuals is really useful for security and safety managing. Every individual is founded on the opinion of other individuals to get a selection and the Internet personifies the location where these judgments are mainly sought, obtained, and evaluated. From this point of view, social networks are characterized by a significant effect. Due to this reason, Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis have found remarkable uses in various environments and one of the most interesting is embodied by public security and safety. The aim of this work is to study the perception of risk of aircraft passengers and users of airports of London (UK) and Rome (Italy) during COVID-19 pandemic. In particular, the airports of London Heathrow and Gatwick and the airports of Rome Fiumicino and Ciampino were studied, from March 23 to July 9, 2020, highlighting the emotional components in three distinct pandemic phases of the considered period in the two countries, by means of the semantic analysis of the textual contents existing in Twitter.","PeriodicalId":101539,"journal":{"name":"2021 International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology (ICCST)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology (ICCST)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCST49569.2021.9717386","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The evaluation of perceived safeness and risk by individuals is really useful for security and safety managing. Every individual is founded on the opinion of other individuals to get a selection and the Internet personifies the location where these judgments are mainly sought, obtained, and evaluated. From this point of view, social networks are characterized by a significant effect. Due to this reason, Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis have found remarkable uses in various environments and one of the most interesting is embodied by public security and safety. The aim of this work is to study the perception of risk of aircraft passengers and users of airports of London (UK) and Rome (Italy) during COVID-19 pandemic. In particular, the airports of London Heathrow and Gatwick and the airports of Rome Fiumicino and Ciampino were studied, from March 23 to July 9, 2020, highlighting the emotional components in three distinct pandemic phases of the considered period in the two countries, by means of the semantic analysis of the textual contents existing in Twitter.
COVID-19大流行期间伦敦和罗马机场安全性和风险认知的情感分析
对个人感知的安全和风险的评估对安全和安全管理非常有用。每个人都是建立在他人意见的基础上进行选择的,而互联网使这些判断主要被寻求、获得和评估的场所人格化。从这个角度来看,社交网络具有显著的影响。由于这个原因,意见挖掘和情感分析在各种环境中都有显著的应用,其中最有趣的一个体现是公共安全和安全。这项工作的目的是研究COVID-19大流行期间伦敦(英国)和罗马(意大利)机场的飞机乘客和用户对风险的感知。特别是,通过对Twitter中存在的文本内容的语义分析,研究了2020年3月23日至7月9日期间伦敦希思罗机场和盖特威克机场以及罗马菲乌米奇诺机场和香皮诺机场,突出了这两个国家在所考虑的三个不同流行病阶段的情感成分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信