Interprofessional Education in Four Canadian Undergraduate Nursing Programs: An Examination of the Supporting Data

E. Donato, N. Lightfoot, L. MacEwan, L. Carter
{"title":"Interprofessional Education in Four Canadian Undergraduate Nursing Programs: An Examination of the Supporting Data","authors":"E. Donato, N. Lightfoot, L. MacEwan, L. Carter","doi":"10.28984/DRHJ.V3I0.297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Canadian nursing programs are required to provide Interprofessional Education (IPE) since formal inclusion in the undergraduate curricula in 2012. This multiple case study explored how four undergraduate university nursing programs in Northern Ontario integrated IPE into their curricula, including opportunities and challenges of meeting the new IPE requirements. Data collected and analyzed in the study were: interviews with program directors, focus groups and interviews with faculty members, program documentation and information on websites, and on-site program observations. This paper extends the findings of this study and the themes identified in it. These themes were as follows: 1) varied understandings of IPE, 2) diverse IPE learning activities within curricula, 3) the requirement for support and resources for IPE and research, 4) student participation and leadership in IPE, and 5) limited IPE evaluation (Author names removed for integrity of review process, 2019). In this paper, the themes are explored in further depth through extensive consideration of documentation provided by the involved universities. These resources complement the data derived through interviews and focus groups with faculty and directors.  Exploration of these data is a valuable means of illuminating any congruencies and dissonances found in the director and faculty data. \n  \n ","PeriodicalId":399325,"journal":{"name":"Diversity of Research in Health Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diversity of Research in Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28984/DRHJ.V3I0.297","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Canadian nursing programs are required to provide Interprofessional Education (IPE) since formal inclusion in the undergraduate curricula in 2012. This multiple case study explored how four undergraduate university nursing programs in Northern Ontario integrated IPE into their curricula, including opportunities and challenges of meeting the new IPE requirements. Data collected and analyzed in the study were: interviews with program directors, focus groups and interviews with faculty members, program documentation and information on websites, and on-site program observations. This paper extends the findings of this study and the themes identified in it. These themes were as follows: 1) varied understandings of IPE, 2) diverse IPE learning activities within curricula, 3) the requirement for support and resources for IPE and research, 4) student participation and leadership in IPE, and 5) limited IPE evaluation (Author names removed for integrity of review process, 2019). In this paper, the themes are explored in further depth through extensive consideration of documentation provided by the involved universities. These resources complement the data derived through interviews and focus groups with faculty and directors.  Exploration of these data is a valuable means of illuminating any congruencies and dissonances found in the director and faculty data.    
四个加拿大本科护理专业的跨专业教育:支持数据的检验
自2012年正式纳入本科课程以来,加拿大护理专业要求提供跨专业教育(IPE)。本多案例研究探讨了安大略省北部四所本科大学护理专业如何将IPE纳入其课程,包括满足新的IPE要求的机遇和挑战。研究中收集和分析的数据包括:与项目主管的访谈、焦点小组和教师的访谈、项目文档和网站上的信息以及现场项目观察。本文扩展了本研究的发现和其中确定的主题。这些主题如下:1)对国际政治经济学的不同理解,2)课程中不同的国际政治经济学学习活动,3)国际政治经济学和研究对支持和资源的需求,4)学生在国际政治经济学中的参与和领导,以及5)有限的国际政治经济学评估(为了审查过程的完整性,2019年删除了作者姓名)。在本文中,通过广泛考虑相关大学提供的文件,对主题进行了更深入的探讨。这些资源补充了通过与教师和主任的访谈和焦点小组获得的数据。对这些数据的探索是阐明在主任和教员数据中发现的任何一致性和不一致性的有价值的手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信