The rise of new public management at the institutional level: an analysis of a Dutch university and the role of administrators in initiating organizational change, 1980s to 2010s

Floris J. N. van Berckel Smit
{"title":"The rise of new public management at the institutional level: an analysis of a Dutch university and the role of administrators in initiating organizational change, 1980s to 2010s","authors":"Floris J. N. van Berckel Smit","doi":"10.1080/17449359.2023.2244462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT New Public Management (NPM) is a remarkable development in the history of the management of public and semi-public organizations and one that requires more attention from historians working on the history of management and organizations. This article examines the rise of NPM at the institutional level through an in-depth analysis of a Dutch university in the 1980s to 2010s. By combining a social-science-based analytical framework for NPM in higher education with a variety of sources, including organizational archives and oral history, the article sheds light on how NPM ideas, techniques, and concepts were transposed to the institutional level. In line with earlier studies, the article illustrates that this was essentially a ‘pick-and-mix’ process in the NPM toolbox. The study complements previous research by generating insights into how management concepts were used to initiate organizational change. The analysis advances previous studies by revealing that NPM-style changes were not only the result of shifts in national policies, but were also instigated by actors (administrators) at the level of the institution. This means that if we want to fully understand NPM, more historical research focusing on the institutional level and the actors involved in organizational change is needed.","PeriodicalId":151075,"journal":{"name":"Management & Organizational History","volume":"114 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management & Organizational History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17449359.2023.2244462","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT New Public Management (NPM) is a remarkable development in the history of the management of public and semi-public organizations and one that requires more attention from historians working on the history of management and organizations. This article examines the rise of NPM at the institutional level through an in-depth analysis of a Dutch university in the 1980s to 2010s. By combining a social-science-based analytical framework for NPM in higher education with a variety of sources, including organizational archives and oral history, the article sheds light on how NPM ideas, techniques, and concepts were transposed to the institutional level. In line with earlier studies, the article illustrates that this was essentially a ‘pick-and-mix’ process in the NPM toolbox. The study complements previous research by generating insights into how management concepts were used to initiate organizational change. The analysis advances previous studies by revealing that NPM-style changes were not only the result of shifts in national policies, but were also instigated by actors (administrators) at the level of the institution. This means that if we want to fully understand NPM, more historical research focusing on the institutional level and the actors involved in organizational change is needed.
新公共管理在制度层面的兴起:对一所荷兰大学的分析以及管理者在组织变革中的作用,1980年代至2010年代
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信