Is the past prologue? Part 1: a qualitative analysis of PDS dissertation research focused on learning

Eva Garin, Diane Yendol‐Hoppey
{"title":"Is the past prologue? Part 1: a qualitative analysis of PDS dissertation research focused on learning","authors":"Eva Garin, Diane Yendol‐Hoppey","doi":"10.1108/sup-02-2023-0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis study provides an analysis of professional development school (PDS) dissertation research that focuses on learning in PDSs. These 103 dissertations written between 1990 and 2020 address an aspect of learning in PDS work, including inquiry as a pedagogical learning tool, student learning PK-12, intern/teacher candidate learning, university teacher educator learning, and inservice teacher learning. From the current exploration of PDS dissertations, most especially from the comparison studies, the authors have learned that there is still no clear path to presenting PDS as having a positive impact when compared with non-PDS experiences..Design/methodology/approachWithin each of these categories, the authors examine the dissertations by methodology and explore common themes among dissertation findings. As the PDS movement enters its third decade of inquiry and builds its efficacy on models of learning, the findings provide insight into the degree to which PDS scholars are building on the past to determine future PDS research agendas around learning.FindingsThe authors examine the dissertations by methodology and explore common themes among dissertation findings. The themes included: intern learning does happen in PDS sites; PDSs provide structures for intern learning; teacher educators can learn from their PDS work; dissertations in the area of student learning overwhelmingly had inconclusive findings, except for research that focused on targeted interventions, which demonstrated student gains.Research limitations/implicationsWith fewer PDS-focused dissertations being written in more recent years, the authors wonder if the complexity of PDS may be a deterrent to the growth and sustainability of this model?Practical implicationsFrom the current exploration of PDS dissertations, most especially from the comparison studies, the authors have learned that the authors still do not have a clear path to presenting PDS as having a positive impact when compared with non-PDS experiences. However, the authors are beginning to understand the types of studies that are needed to move this agenda forward and hope the work will help inform the PDS community of some.Originality/valueThis is the first known study of PDS dissertations across time.","PeriodicalId":358031,"journal":{"name":"School-University Partnerships","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"School-University Partnerships","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/sup-02-2023-0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

PurposeThis study provides an analysis of professional development school (PDS) dissertation research that focuses on learning in PDSs. These 103 dissertations written between 1990 and 2020 address an aspect of learning in PDS work, including inquiry as a pedagogical learning tool, student learning PK-12, intern/teacher candidate learning, university teacher educator learning, and inservice teacher learning. From the current exploration of PDS dissertations, most especially from the comparison studies, the authors have learned that there is still no clear path to presenting PDS as having a positive impact when compared with non-PDS experiences..Design/methodology/approachWithin each of these categories, the authors examine the dissertations by methodology and explore common themes among dissertation findings. As the PDS movement enters its third decade of inquiry and builds its efficacy on models of learning, the findings provide insight into the degree to which PDS scholars are building on the past to determine future PDS research agendas around learning.FindingsThe authors examine the dissertations by methodology and explore common themes among dissertation findings. The themes included: intern learning does happen in PDS sites; PDSs provide structures for intern learning; teacher educators can learn from their PDS work; dissertations in the area of student learning overwhelmingly had inconclusive findings, except for research that focused on targeted interventions, which demonstrated student gains.Research limitations/implicationsWith fewer PDS-focused dissertations being written in more recent years, the authors wonder if the complexity of PDS may be a deterrent to the growth and sustainability of this model?Practical implicationsFrom the current exploration of PDS dissertations, most especially from the comparison studies, the authors have learned that the authors still do not have a clear path to presenting PDS as having a positive impact when compared with non-PDS experiences. However, the authors are beginning to understand the types of studies that are needed to move this agenda forward and hope the work will help inform the PDS community of some.Originality/valueThis is the first known study of PDS dissertations across time.
过去是序幕吗?第一部分:以学习为重点的PDS论文研究的定性分析
目的本研究对专业发展学校(PDS)的论文研究进行分析,重点关注PDS的学习。这103篇论文写于1990年至2020年之间,涉及PDS工作中学习的一个方面,包括作为教学学习工具的探究、学生学习PK-12、实习生/教师候选人学习、大学教师教育学习和在职教师学习。从目前对PDS论文的探索,尤其是比较研究中,作者发现,与非PDS经历相比,仍然没有明确的途径来呈现PDS具有积极的影响。设计/方法/方法在这些类别中,作者通过方法检查论文,并探索论文发现中的共同主题。随着PDS运动进入第三个十年的探索,并在学习模型上建立其有效性,这些发现提供了PDS学者在多大程度上建立在过去的基础上,以确定未来PDS围绕学习的研究议程。研究结果作者通过方法检查论文,并探讨论文发现中的共同主题。主题包括:实习学习确实发生在PDS站点;pdp提供实习学习的结构;教师教育工作者可以从他们的PDS工作中学习;在学生学习领域的论文绝大多数都没有结论性的发现,除了那些专注于有针对性的干预的研究,这些研究表明了学生的收获。研究限制/影响近年来,关注PDS的论文越来越少,作者想知道PDS的复杂性是否会阻碍这种模式的发展和可持续性?从目前对PDS论文的探索中,尤其是比较研究中,作者发现,与非PDS经历相比,作者仍然没有一个明确的途径来呈现PDS具有积极的影响。然而,作者正在开始了解推动这一议程所需的研究类型,并希望这项工作将有助于向PDS社区提供一些信息。原创性/价值这是第一个已知的跨时间的PDS论文研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信