Paradigm of Special Autonomy and National Integration in Papua

Ester Yambeyapdi
{"title":"Paradigm of Special Autonomy and National Integration in Papua","authors":"Ester Yambeyapdi","doi":"10.53013/bestuurskunde.2.2.159-172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The New Order regime's way of resolving the problem of Papua's national integration did not produce desirable results. The New Order regime, with its authoritarian and centralized practices, has provided valuable lessons for the nation. This study is a review of political history that aimed to analyze the national integration issues in several areas in Papua, which has not been resolved during the 21 years of Special Autonomy in Papua. The results of the study showed that the situation of the Papuan during the New Order Regime influenced the national integration of Papuans during the Special Autonomy implementation. The issue of Papua's national integration during the New Order regime and the Special Autonomy implementation in the Reformation era was an anomaly in the truth because the truth was determined by the ruler (hegemonic authority). The special autonomy has accelerated the development of Papua, but also created discrimination between tribes and groups in social, cultural, economic, and political life. Learning from history, to avoid making the same mistakes in the future, the humanist approach taken by the church can be a solution to unify the differences between Papuan \"Komen\" and migrants \"Amber.\" The church teaches the value of love, peace, sacrifice, and unifying forgiveness. Reconciliation with the memory of the sufferings of the Papuan is a bridge that connects the Papuan to a dignified life as part of Indonesia. Papua's Special Autonomy is a nationwide process to improve itself and a path toward the goal of realizing the ideals of the proclamation. Alignment to basic human needs, following the noble ideals of the August 17, 1945, Proclamation of Independence, allows Papuans not to question or doubt the integration of Papua into the Republic of Indonesia.","PeriodicalId":253000,"journal":{"name":"Bestuurskunde: Journal of Governmental Studies","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bestuurskunde: Journal of Governmental Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53013/bestuurskunde.2.2.159-172","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The New Order regime's way of resolving the problem of Papua's national integration did not produce desirable results. The New Order regime, with its authoritarian and centralized practices, has provided valuable lessons for the nation. This study is a review of political history that aimed to analyze the national integration issues in several areas in Papua, which has not been resolved during the 21 years of Special Autonomy in Papua. The results of the study showed that the situation of the Papuan during the New Order Regime influenced the national integration of Papuans during the Special Autonomy implementation. The issue of Papua's national integration during the New Order regime and the Special Autonomy implementation in the Reformation era was an anomaly in the truth because the truth was determined by the ruler (hegemonic authority). The special autonomy has accelerated the development of Papua, but also created discrimination between tribes and groups in social, cultural, economic, and political life. Learning from history, to avoid making the same mistakes in the future, the humanist approach taken by the church can be a solution to unify the differences between Papuan "Komen" and migrants "Amber." The church teaches the value of love, peace, sacrifice, and unifying forgiveness. Reconciliation with the memory of the sufferings of the Papuan is a bridge that connects the Papuan to a dignified life as part of Indonesia. Papua's Special Autonomy is a nationwide process to improve itself and a path toward the goal of realizing the ideals of the proclamation. Alignment to basic human needs, following the noble ideals of the August 17, 1945, Proclamation of Independence, allows Papuans not to question or doubt the integration of Papua into the Republic of Indonesia.
巴布亚特别自治与民族融合的范例
新秩序政权解决巴布亚民族一体化问题的方法没有产生理想的结果。新秩序政权以其专制和集权的做法,为国家提供了宝贵的教训。这项研究是对政治史的回顾,目的是分析巴布亚几个地区的民族一体化问题,这些问题在巴布亚21年的特别自治期间没有得到解决。研究结果表明,新秩序政权期间巴布亚的情况影响了特别自治实施期间巴布亚人的民族融合。新秩序政权时期的巴布亚民族一体化问题和宗教改革时期的特别自治实施问题是真理中的反常现象,因为真理是由统治者(霸权权威)决定的。这种特殊的自治权加速了巴布亚的发展,但也在社会、文化、经济和政治生活中造成了部落和群体之间的歧视。从历史中学习,为了避免在未来犯同样的错误,教会采取的人道主义方法可以成为统一巴布亚“科曼”和移民“琥珀”之间差异的解决方案。教会教导爱、和平、牺牲和统一宽恕的价值。与对巴布亚人苦难的记忆和解是一座桥梁,将巴布亚人与作为印度尼西亚一部分的有尊严的生活联系起来。巴布亚特别自治是一个全国性的自我完善的过程,也是实现《宣言》理想目标的道路。遵循1945年8月17日《独立宣言》的崇高理想,与人类的基本需求保持一致,使巴布亚人不会质疑或怀疑将巴布亚并入印度尼西亚共和国。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信