The Wagner Act on Trial: The 1937 'Little Steel' Strike and the Limits of New Deal Reform

Ahmed A. White
{"title":"The Wagner Act on Trial: The 1937 'Little Steel' Strike and the Limits of New Deal Reform","authors":"Ahmed A. White","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2443447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The National Labor Relations Act of 1935, or Wagner Act, played a crucial role in shaping the New Deal and eventually transforming the economic, political, and legal foundations of modern America. Although many aspects of the statute’s history, including its relationship to the rise of industrial unionism and the epic struggle to secure its constitutionality, have been well told by historians and legal scholars, key elements of its story remain obscured by misconceptions, oversight, and outright myth. Not least among these areas of uncertainty is how the new law actually functioned in the months and years immediately after the Supreme Court upheld its constitutionality, and what its fate in this crucial time says about the nature of the New Deal itself. This article undertakes to shed light on these questions by unfolding the history of one of the most important events in the Second New Deal period: the “Little Steel” Strike of 1937. Drawing on a host of sources, including five major archival collections, this article tells the story of this dramatic and violent episode, including its legal history. Presenting the strike as a key test of the Wagner Act and a critical bellwether of the New Deal, the article documents not only the virtues of new regime in labor rights just as it emerged from the shadow of unconstitutionality, but also congenital shortcomings in the labor law that have undermined workers’ rights ever since. In a further challenge to conventional narratives of the period, the story of the strike exposes the remarkable degree to which the power of the business community survived, relatively undiminished, the Wagner Act and the political changes that accompanied it. Moreover, giving credence to a broader literature on New Deal law and policy, the article presents the strike and litigation surrounding it as proof of the continuing weakness of the New Deal and as key moments in the conservative turn that marked course of reform in the late 1930s.","PeriodicalId":280037,"journal":{"name":"Law & Society: Legislation eJournal","volume":"117 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law & Society: Legislation eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2443447","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The National Labor Relations Act of 1935, or Wagner Act, played a crucial role in shaping the New Deal and eventually transforming the economic, political, and legal foundations of modern America. Although many aspects of the statute’s history, including its relationship to the rise of industrial unionism and the epic struggle to secure its constitutionality, have been well told by historians and legal scholars, key elements of its story remain obscured by misconceptions, oversight, and outright myth. Not least among these areas of uncertainty is how the new law actually functioned in the months and years immediately after the Supreme Court upheld its constitutionality, and what its fate in this crucial time says about the nature of the New Deal itself. This article undertakes to shed light on these questions by unfolding the history of one of the most important events in the Second New Deal period: the “Little Steel” Strike of 1937. Drawing on a host of sources, including five major archival collections, this article tells the story of this dramatic and violent episode, including its legal history. Presenting the strike as a key test of the Wagner Act and a critical bellwether of the New Deal, the article documents not only the virtues of new regime in labor rights just as it emerged from the shadow of unconstitutionality, but also congenital shortcomings in the labor law that have undermined workers’ rights ever since. In a further challenge to conventional narratives of the period, the story of the strike exposes the remarkable degree to which the power of the business community survived, relatively undiminished, the Wagner Act and the political changes that accompanied it. Moreover, giving credence to a broader literature on New Deal law and policy, the article presents the strike and litigation surrounding it as proof of the continuing weakness of the New Deal and as key moments in the conservative turn that marked course of reform in the late 1930s.
瓦格纳法案审判:1937年的“小钢铁”罢工和新政改革的局限性
1935年的《国家劳工关系法》,或称瓦格纳法,在形成新政并最终改变现代美国的经济、政治和法律基础方面发挥了关键作用。尽管历史学家和法律学者已经很好地讲述了该法令历史的许多方面,包括它与工业工会主义兴起的关系,以及为确保其合宪性而进行的史诗般的斗争,但其故事的关键要素仍然被误解、疏忽和彻底的神话所掩盖。在这些不确定的领域中,最重要的是,在最高法院维持其合宪性之后的几个月或几年里,新法律实际上是如何运作的,以及在这个关键时刻,它的命运说明了新政本身的性质。本文试图通过揭示第二次新政时期最重要的事件之一:1937年的“小钢铁”罢工的历史,来阐明这些问题。本文利用包括五个主要档案收藏在内的大量资料,讲述了这一戏剧性和暴力事件的故事,包括其法律历史。这篇文章将罢工作为瓦格纳法案的关键考验和新政的关键风向标,不仅记录了从违宪的阴影中出现的新劳工权利制度的优点,而且还记录了劳动法的先天缺陷,这些缺陷从那时起就损害了工人的权利。罢工的故事进一步挑战了那个时期的传统叙事,它暴露出商界的力量在多大程度上幸存了下来,而且相对未受削弱,《瓦格纳法案》(Wagner Act)及其伴随的政治变革。此外,通过对更广泛的关于新政法律和政策的文献的信任,文章将围绕新政的罢工和诉讼作为新政持续弱点的证据,并作为20世纪30年代末标志着改革进程的保守转向的关键时刻。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信