Pattern of Distributions Test for Discretionary Trusts: Defects Reveal Questionable Policy Design and Implementation

Dale Boccabella
{"title":"Pattern of Distributions Test for Discretionary Trusts: Defects Reveal Questionable Policy Design and Implementation","authors":"Dale Boccabella","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2636671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The pattern of distributions test (PODT) is a qualifying rule for revenue loss usage by discretionary trusts (non-fixed trusts) that are not a family trust. The PODT has received little attention from tax commentators. This article is related to an earlier article. The earlier article outlined the technical deficiencies in the PODT and concluded that the PODT is largely ineffective, or at least severely compromised, as a loss-access qualifying criterion for discretionary trusts. This article focuses on the policy challenges in designing an effective continuity of ownership type test for discretionary trusts, which is what the PODT is. This article concludes that while there are considerable challenges in designing an effective loss-access qualifying criterion for discretionary trusts, the current PODT falls far short of a credible loss-access qualifying rule.","PeriodicalId":198089,"journal":{"name":"Australian Tax Forum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Tax Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2636671","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The pattern of distributions test (PODT) is a qualifying rule for revenue loss usage by discretionary trusts (non-fixed trusts) that are not a family trust. The PODT has received little attention from tax commentators. This article is related to an earlier article. The earlier article outlined the technical deficiencies in the PODT and concluded that the PODT is largely ineffective, or at least severely compromised, as a loss-access qualifying criterion for discretionary trusts. This article focuses on the policy challenges in designing an effective continuity of ownership type test for discretionary trusts, which is what the PODT is. This article concludes that while there are considerable challenges in designing an effective loss-access qualifying criterion for discretionary trusts, the current PODT falls far short of a credible loss-access qualifying rule.
全权委托信托的分布模式检验:缺陷揭示了政策设计与实施的问题
分布模式检验(PODT)是对非家族信托的全权委托信托(非固定信托)使用收入损失的限定规则。PODT几乎没有受到税务评论员的关注。本文与前一篇文章相关。前一篇文章概述了PODT的技术缺陷,并得出结论,PODT在很大程度上是无效的,或者至少是严重受损的,作为自由裁量信托的失去访问资格标准。本文关注的是为全权委托信托设计有效的所有权类型连续性测试所面临的政策挑战,即PODT。本文的结论是,尽管在为自由裁量信托设计有效的丧失准入资格标准方面存在相当大的挑战,但目前的PODT远未达到可信的丧失准入资格规则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信