Immersive virtual reality versus webcam in an online language course

Borja Herrera
{"title":"Immersive virtual reality versus webcam in an online language\n course","authors":"Borja Herrera","doi":"10.14705/rpnet.2021.54.1322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates the differences between Immersive Virtual\n Reality (IVR) and the webcam (WBC) in the context of a Spanish\n distance-learning course. Two specific objectives were set: (1) to determine\n the existence of a relationship of dependence between the device used and\n the oral interaction, and (2) to analyse the existence of a dependency\n relationship between the device utilised and the perception of copresence.\n To that end, online courses and semi-structured interviews were conducted.\n Regarding the first objective, there is a higher chance of speaking\n exchanges between student-tutor and tutor-student when using WBC. As for the\n second objective, we did not have sufficient feedback to determine whether\n the perception of copresence varies depending on the two profiles. However,\n the analysis indicates that non-verbal communication was essential for IVR\n volunteers to experience copresence. The conclusions suggest that the IVR\n could be more appropriate than WBC for socio-constructivist and\n communicative teaching pedagogies2.","PeriodicalId":350173,"journal":{"name":"CALL and professionalisation: short papers from EUROCALL 2021","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CALL and professionalisation: short papers from EUROCALL 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2021.54.1322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper investigates the differences between Immersive Virtual Reality (IVR) and the webcam (WBC) in the context of a Spanish distance-learning course. Two specific objectives were set: (1) to determine the existence of a relationship of dependence between the device used and the oral interaction, and (2) to analyse the existence of a dependency relationship between the device utilised and the perception of copresence. To that end, online courses and semi-structured interviews were conducted. Regarding the first objective, there is a higher chance of speaking exchanges between student-tutor and tutor-student when using WBC. As for the second objective, we did not have sufficient feedback to determine whether the perception of copresence varies depending on the two profiles. However, the analysis indicates that non-verbal communication was essential for IVR volunteers to experience copresence. The conclusions suggest that the IVR could be more appropriate than WBC for socio-constructivist and communicative teaching pedagogies2.
沉浸式虚拟现实与网络摄像头在在线语言课程中的对比
本文研究了沉浸式虚拟现实(IVR)和网络摄像头(WBC)在西班牙语远程学习课程中的差异。设定了两个具体目标:(1)确定所使用的设备与口腔互动之间是否存在依赖关系,以及(2)分析所使用的设备与共同感知之间是否存在依赖关系。为此,开展了在线课程和半结构化访谈。关于第一个目标,使用WBC时,学生-导师和导师-学生之间的口语交流机会更高。至于第二个目标,我们没有足够的反馈来确定共同存在的感知是否会因两种概况而有所不同。然而,分析表明,非语言交流对于IVR志愿者体验存在是必不可少的。结论表明IVR比WBC更适合社会建构主义和交际教学法2。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信