A cost-based FMEA decision tool for product quality design and management

Michael H. Wang
{"title":"A cost-based FMEA decision tool for product quality design and management","authors":"Michael H. Wang","doi":"10.1109/ISI.2011.5984101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) method has been a popular tool by the design and quality/reliability engineering profession for product design and quality/reliability improvement. Fundamentally, through the prioritized improvement targets suggested by FMEA, designers and engineers can improve the overall quality and reliability of either products or processes. The priority is based on a ranked compound score named Risk Priority Number (RPN) which is the product of three factors: occurrence, severity, and detection. However, one of the main disadvantages for FMEA is the fuzziness of assigning a value (zero to ten) toward the three factors which could be considered as subjective decision and the value may vary from person to person. In this article, we proposed the adoption of quality cost factors that are used to replace the ambiguous factors used in the traditional FMEA calculation. In addition, a Graphical-User-Interface (GUI) has been developed which can present the FMEA outcome in a cause-effect relationship figure rather than the traditional FMEA table-form format.","PeriodicalId":220165,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of 2011 IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of 2011 IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISI.2011.5984101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) method has been a popular tool by the design and quality/reliability engineering profession for product design and quality/reliability improvement. Fundamentally, through the prioritized improvement targets suggested by FMEA, designers and engineers can improve the overall quality and reliability of either products or processes. The priority is based on a ranked compound score named Risk Priority Number (RPN) which is the product of three factors: occurrence, severity, and detection. However, one of the main disadvantages for FMEA is the fuzziness of assigning a value (zero to ten) toward the three factors which could be considered as subjective decision and the value may vary from person to person. In this article, we proposed the adoption of quality cost factors that are used to replace the ambiguous factors used in the traditional FMEA calculation. In addition, a Graphical-User-Interface (GUI) has been developed which can present the FMEA outcome in a cause-effect relationship figure rather than the traditional FMEA table-form format.
基于成本的FMEA决策工具,用于产品质量设计和管理
失效模式和影响分析(FMEA)方法已成为设计和质量/可靠性工程专业用于产品设计和质量/可靠性改进的常用工具。从根本上说,通过FMEA提出的优先改进目标,设计师和工程师可以提高产品或工艺的整体质量和可靠性。优先级是基于一个称为风险优先级数(RPN)的排名复合分数,RPN是三个因素的产物:发生、严重程度和检测。然而,FMEA的主要缺点之一是对三个因素分配值(0到10)的模糊性,这些因素可以被认为是主观决策,并且值可能因人而异。在本文中,我们提出采用质量成本因子来取代传统FMEA计算中使用的模糊因子。此外,图形用户界面(GUI)已经开发出来,它可以在因果关系图中呈现FMEA结果,而不是传统的FMEA表格形式格式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信