The Impact of Trade on Poverty in Sub-Saharan Africa: Do Sources Matter?

Regret Sunge, Nyasha B. Kumbula, Biatrice S. Makamba
{"title":"The Impact of Trade on Poverty in Sub-Saharan Africa: Do Sources Matter?","authors":"Regret Sunge, Nyasha B. Kumbula, Biatrice S. Makamba","doi":"10.18488/JOURNAL.62.2021.83.234.244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Global trade development has provided noteworthy global poverty gains since the 1990s. Accordingly, Africa has gradually engaged itself in trade and trade policy reforms through multilateral and regional trade agreements among other initiatives. Nonetheless, poverty levels in the Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) region remain relatively high. Recognizing that existing evidence on trade-poverty nexus is based on aggregate trade, we provide a new perspective on SSA by disaggregating trade by sources for the period 2003-2017. We employed the Generalised Method of Moments (GMM) estimation of a panel data model derived from the Modified Basic Household Model and Neo-Conservative Poverty Theory for analysis. The results document poverty gains from trade liberalization, with the extent varying according to sources. Specifically, trade from MENA and within SSA was found to offer more gains. Furthermore, findings suggest that poverty gains from trade are strengthened with better institutional quality. It follows that to accelerate poverty gains from trade liberalization, SSA should promote intra-Africa trade as well as trade with MENA countries. To accelerate the gains, Africa has to invest in better institutions, in particular, to improve governance and corruption eradication. Contribution/Originality: This study contributes to existing literature on trade-poverty nexus in two ways. Firstly, instead of basing conclusions on aggregate trade, we focus on trade by sources. We disaggregate SSA’s trade by regional sources. Secondly, we introduce control of corruption interaction term to control for institutional quality in the analysis.","PeriodicalId":416720,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Business, Economics and Management","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Business, Economics and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18488/JOURNAL.62.2021.83.234.244","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Global trade development has provided noteworthy global poverty gains since the 1990s. Accordingly, Africa has gradually engaged itself in trade and trade policy reforms through multilateral and regional trade agreements among other initiatives. Nonetheless, poverty levels in the Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) region remain relatively high. Recognizing that existing evidence on trade-poverty nexus is based on aggregate trade, we provide a new perspective on SSA by disaggregating trade by sources for the period 2003-2017. We employed the Generalised Method of Moments (GMM) estimation of a panel data model derived from the Modified Basic Household Model and Neo-Conservative Poverty Theory for analysis. The results document poverty gains from trade liberalization, with the extent varying according to sources. Specifically, trade from MENA and within SSA was found to offer more gains. Furthermore, findings suggest that poverty gains from trade are strengthened with better institutional quality. It follows that to accelerate poverty gains from trade liberalization, SSA should promote intra-Africa trade as well as trade with MENA countries. To accelerate the gains, Africa has to invest in better institutions, in particular, to improve governance and corruption eradication. Contribution/Originality: This study contributes to existing literature on trade-poverty nexus in two ways. Firstly, instead of basing conclusions on aggregate trade, we focus on trade by sources. We disaggregate SSA’s trade by regional sources. Secondly, we introduce control of corruption interaction term to control for institutional quality in the analysis.
贸易对撒哈拉以南非洲贫困的影响:来源重要吗?
自20世纪90年代以来,全球贸易发展在全球贫困问题上取得了显著进展。因此,非洲已逐步通过多边和区域贸易协定等倡议参与贸易和贸易政策改革。尽管如此,撒哈拉以南非洲(SSA)地区的贫困水平仍然相对较高。认识到贸易-贫困关系的现有证据是基于贸易总量的,我们通过对2003-2017年期间的贸易来源进行分类,为SSA提供了一个新的视角。我们采用广义矩量法(GMM)对一个来自修正基本家庭模型和新保守主义贫困理论的面板数据模型进行估计。研究结果证明了贸易自由化对贫困的好处,其程度因来源而异。具体而言,来自中东和北非地区和SSA内部的贸易被发现提供了更多的收益。此外,研究结果表明,贸易带来的贫困收益随着制度质量的提高而得到加强。因此,为了加速贸易自由化带来的贫困收益,南非洲区域应促进非洲内部贸易以及与中东和北非国家的贸易。为了加速取得成果,非洲必须投资于更好的制度,特别是改善治理和消除腐败。贡献/独创性:本研究对贸易-贫困关系的现有文献有两方面的贡献。首先,我们没有把结论建立在贸易总量上,而是把重点放在贸易来源上。我们将SSA的贸易按地区来源分类。其次,在分析中引入腐败相互作用项的控制来控制制度质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信