The Forms of Categorical Proposition

F. Schang, G. Englebretsen, J.-Martín Castro-Manzano
{"title":"The Forms of Categorical Proposition","authors":"F. Schang, G. Englebretsen, J.-Martín Castro-Manzano","doi":"10.4204/EPTCS.358.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An exhaustive survey of categorical propositions is proposed in the present paper, both with respect to their nature and the logical problems raised by them. Through a comparative analysis of Term Logic and First-Order Logic, it is shown that the famous problem of existential import may be solved in two ways: with a model-adaptive strategy, in which the square of opposition is validated by restricting the models; with a language-adaptive strategy, in which the logical form of categorical propositions is extended in order to validate the square in every model. The latter strategy is advocated in the name of logic, which means truth in every model. Finally, the present paper needs some automatic process in order to determine the nature of logical relations between any pair of the available 256 categorical propositions. This requires the implementation of a programming machine in the style of Prolog.","PeriodicalId":214417,"journal":{"name":"Non-Classical Logic. Theory and Applications","volume":"3 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Non-Classical Logic. Theory and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4204/EPTCS.358.17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An exhaustive survey of categorical propositions is proposed in the present paper, both with respect to their nature and the logical problems raised by them. Through a comparative analysis of Term Logic and First-Order Logic, it is shown that the famous problem of existential import may be solved in two ways: with a model-adaptive strategy, in which the square of opposition is validated by restricting the models; with a language-adaptive strategy, in which the logical form of categorical propositions is extended in order to validate the square in every model. The latter strategy is advocated in the name of logic, which means truth in every model. Finally, the present paper needs some automatic process in order to determine the nature of logical relations between any pair of the available 256 categorical propositions. This requires the implementation of a programming machine in the style of Prolog.
直言命题的形式
本文就直言命题的性质及其所引起的逻辑问题,对直言命题作了详尽的研究。通过对项逻辑和一阶逻辑的比较分析,证明了有两种方法可以解决著名的存在输入问题:采用模型自适应策略,通过限制模型来验证对立方;采用语言自适应策略,对直言命题的逻辑形式进行扩展,以验证每个模型中的方形。后一种策略是以逻辑的名义提倡的,逻辑意味着每一种模式都是真理。最后,本文需要一些自动过程来确定256个直言命题中任意一对之间的逻辑关系的性质。这需要实现Prolog风格的编程机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信