21ST CENTURY SKILLS AND DIGITAL SKILLS, ARE ONE AND THE SAME THING?

Helena Belchior-Rocha, Rosário Mauritti, João Monteiro, Luis Carneiro
{"title":"21ST CENTURY SKILLS AND DIGITAL SKILLS, ARE ONE AND THE SAME THING?","authors":"Helena Belchior-Rocha, Rosário Mauritti, João Monteiro, Luis Carneiro","doi":"10.21125/edulearn.2020.0831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The need to prepare the next generation for the labour market and for new social contexts requires that higher education (ES) reorganizes its learning and training offers to reflect this growing demand. In order to do this, higher education institutions (HEIs) must face certain challenges in identifying and understanding the characteristics and needs of the new generation of students. Over the last few decades, reference models on transversal competences (soft skills) have been established, classifying them under these nomenclatures: instrumental, interpersonal and systemic. However, such classifications do not always consider the temporal and socioeconomic contexts of such references. With the aim of designing a more adequate offer of formative education, we have developed a study based on the systematization of the literature encompassing reference models, categorization and terminology of competences skills and aptitudes. Our study intends to analyses to what extent classification systems (at least in some cases) refer to equal, different or complementary competences in each one. An asymmetry remains evident between the needs for skills enabling full participation in the present digital society and the educational development that HEIs offer convergent with these same needs. Such an asymmetry not only exists at the professional level, but also affects the behavioral, emotional, social, and cultural capacities. Moreover, unlike digital skills, 21st century skills are not necessarily underpinned solely by digital technologies. If two decades ago the categorization terminology were limited to instrumental, interpersonal and systemic skills, the research in this area would have developed more detailed frameworks that do not separate 21st century skills from digital skills, but instead a more comprehensive set would have been established: foundational or fundamental, emancipatory and humanistic, social and emotional skills to learn, create and innovate, and artistic skills. In addition, the discussion focuses on students' abilities to acquire and develop these new skills in an academic and professional context while disregarding the teacher's capacities to conduct and integrate those skills in transversal and transdisciplinary approaches in teaching and learning.","PeriodicalId":345570,"journal":{"name":"EDULEARN20 Proceedings","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EDULEARN20 Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2020.0831","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The need to prepare the next generation for the labour market and for new social contexts requires that higher education (ES) reorganizes its learning and training offers to reflect this growing demand. In order to do this, higher education institutions (HEIs) must face certain challenges in identifying and understanding the characteristics and needs of the new generation of students. Over the last few decades, reference models on transversal competences (soft skills) have been established, classifying them under these nomenclatures: instrumental, interpersonal and systemic. However, such classifications do not always consider the temporal and socioeconomic contexts of such references. With the aim of designing a more adequate offer of formative education, we have developed a study based on the systematization of the literature encompassing reference models, categorization and terminology of competences skills and aptitudes. Our study intends to analyses to what extent classification systems (at least in some cases) refer to equal, different or complementary competences in each one. An asymmetry remains evident between the needs for skills enabling full participation in the present digital society and the educational development that HEIs offer convergent with these same needs. Such an asymmetry not only exists at the professional level, but also affects the behavioral, emotional, social, and cultural capacities. Moreover, unlike digital skills, 21st century skills are not necessarily underpinned solely by digital technologies. If two decades ago the categorization terminology were limited to instrumental, interpersonal and systemic skills, the research in this area would have developed more detailed frameworks that do not separate 21st century skills from digital skills, but instead a more comprehensive set would have been established: foundational or fundamental, emancipatory and humanistic, social and emotional skills to learn, create and innovate, and artistic skills. In addition, the discussion focuses on students' abilities to acquire and develop these new skills in an academic and professional context while disregarding the teacher's capacities to conduct and integrate those skills in transversal and transdisciplinary approaches in teaching and learning.
21世纪的技能和数字技能是一回事吗?
为了让下一代为劳动力市场和新的社会环境做好准备,高等教育(ES)需要重新组织其学习和培训,以反映这种不断增长的需求。为了做到这一点,高等教育机构在识别和了解新一代学生的特点和需求方面必须面临一些挑战。在过去的几十年里,关于横向能力(软技能)的参考模型已经建立起来,并将它们分为以下几类:工具性、人际性和系统性。然而,这种分类并不总是考虑这些参考文献的时间和社会经济背景。为了设计更充分的形成性教育,我们基于文献的系统化,包括参考模型、能力、技能和能力的分类和术语,开展了一项研究。我们的研究旨在分析分类系统(至少在某些情况下)在多大程度上涉及每个分类系统中的平等、不同或互补能力。在充分参与当今数码社会的技能需求与高等教育机构提供的教育发展之间,仍然存在明显的不对称。这种不对称不仅存在于专业层面,也影响着行为、情感、社会和文化能力。此外,与数字技能不同,21世纪的技能不一定完全由数字技术支撑。如果20年前的分类术语仅限于工具性、人际关系和系统性技能,那么这一领域的研究将开发出更详细的框架,不会将21世纪的技能与数字技能分开,而是建立一套更全面的框架:基础或基本技能、解放性和人文主义、学习、创造和创新的社会和情感技能,以及艺术技能。此外,讨论的重点是学生在学术和专业背景下获得和发展这些新技能的能力,而忽视了教师在教学和学习中运用和整合这些技能的横向和跨学科方法的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信