A comparative profitability of pineapple-mono crop and pineapple intercrops of Modhupur area in Tangail district of Bangladesh

T. Sultan, S. Islam, M. Islam, Md. Imrul Kaysar
{"title":"A comparative profitability of pineapple-mono crop and pineapple intercrops of Modhupur area in Tangail district of Bangladesh","authors":"T. Sultan, S. Islam, M. Islam, Md. Imrul Kaysar","doi":"10.3329/aajfss.v2i2.55908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A survey study was conducted to estimate the cost, returns, relative profitability and practices of Pineapple mono-crop and Pineapple inter-crops production in Madhupur area of Tangail District. Data was collected personally through prepared interview schedule from 60 randomly selected Pineapple growers from Ausnara, Oronkhola, Sonia and Motel bazar union under Madhupur Upazila of Tangail District during July to October 2013. A simple random sampling was followed to select the farmers in the study area. Both tabular and statistical analyses were applied in this study. Cost and return analysis showed that total cost incurred for producing Pineapple mono crop, Pineapple+Papaya and Pineapple+Banana+Aroid were Tk.312849.72, Tk.395894.01 and Tk.377013.25 per hectare respectively. Per hectare net return for Pineapple + Papaya and Pineapple + Banana + Aroid production were Tk.492111.00 and Tk.195704.75 which were higher than that of Pineapple mono crop (Tk.157675.28). On the other hand BCR for Pineapple + Papaya and Pineapple + Banana + Aroid production were 2.24 and 1.52 which were higher than that of Pineapple mono crop (1.50). It represents that both pineapple mono-crop and pineapple inter-crops production are profitable among them Pineapple-inter crops cropping pattern is more profitable then Pineapple-mono crop. About 80% of pineapple growers grow papaya, banana, zinger, turmeric and aroids as intercrops with pineapple. The study identified some crucial problems and probable solutions suggested by the farmer. Finally, some policy recommendations were suggested and avenues for further research were shown. \nAsian Australas. J. Food Saf. Secur. 2018, 2(2), 56-64","PeriodicalId":257069,"journal":{"name":"Asian-Australasian Journal of Food Safety and Security","volume":"257 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian-Australasian Journal of Food Safety and Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/aajfss.v2i2.55908","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

A survey study was conducted to estimate the cost, returns, relative profitability and practices of Pineapple mono-crop and Pineapple inter-crops production in Madhupur area of Tangail District. Data was collected personally through prepared interview schedule from 60 randomly selected Pineapple growers from Ausnara, Oronkhola, Sonia and Motel bazar union under Madhupur Upazila of Tangail District during July to October 2013. A simple random sampling was followed to select the farmers in the study area. Both tabular and statistical analyses were applied in this study. Cost and return analysis showed that total cost incurred for producing Pineapple mono crop, Pineapple+Papaya and Pineapple+Banana+Aroid were Tk.312849.72, Tk.395894.01 and Tk.377013.25 per hectare respectively. Per hectare net return for Pineapple + Papaya and Pineapple + Banana + Aroid production were Tk.492111.00 and Tk.195704.75 which were higher than that of Pineapple mono crop (Tk.157675.28). On the other hand BCR for Pineapple + Papaya and Pineapple + Banana + Aroid production were 2.24 and 1.52 which were higher than that of Pineapple mono crop (1.50). It represents that both pineapple mono-crop and pineapple inter-crops production are profitable among them Pineapple-inter crops cropping pattern is more profitable then Pineapple-mono crop. About 80% of pineapple growers grow papaya, banana, zinger, turmeric and aroids as intercrops with pineapple. The study identified some crucial problems and probable solutions suggested by the farmer. Finally, some policy recommendations were suggested and avenues for further research were shown. Asian Australas. J. Food Saf. Secur. 2018, 2(2), 56-64
孟加拉国坦盖尔地区莫德胡普尔地区菠萝单作和菠萝间作的比较盈利能力
通过调查研究,估计了菠萝单作和间作生产的成本、收益、相对盈利能力和做法。本研究于2013年7月至10月期间,通过事先准备的访谈计划,对60名随机抽取的菠萝种植者进行访谈。这些种植者分别来自坦吉尔区Madhupur Upazila的Ausnara、Oronkhola、Sonia和Motel bazaar工会。采用简单随机抽样的方法,选取研究区内的农户。本研究采用表格分析和统计分析相结合的方法。成本与收益分析表明,菠萝单作、菠萝+木瓜和菠萝+香蕉+黄果的总成本分别为每公顷312849.72、395894.01和377013.25。菠萝+木瓜和菠萝+香蕉+红果的每公顷净收益分别为492111.00和195704.75,高于菠萝单作(157675.28)。菠萝+木瓜和菠萝+香蕉+牛油果的BCR分别为2.24和1.52,均高于菠萝单作(1.50)。说明菠萝单作和菠萝间作都是有利可图的,其中菠萝间作模式比菠萝单作模式更有利可图。大约80%的菠萝种植者种植木瓜、香蕉、生姜、姜黄和番石榴作为菠萝的间作。该研究确定了一些关键问题和农民提出的可能的解决方案。最后,提出了一些政策建议,并指出了进一步研究的途径。亚洲Australas。J.食品安全。安全,2018,2(2),56-64
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信